From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BF21381FB for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 03:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AC8721C074; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 03:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF68121C068 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 03:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id fw7so11347616vcb.17 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:05:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DEbziKv7DUd0fzLgbiDDmgLjs167qm50LhShYGUsIJo=; b=ho8I6qtg02squDlYGHGF5pyOLeJd+jhEcSj6rMgSS5Xw94RxVcsJwcnWDVuct/kug8 shEj0s0zApUP2AJWO78VRvnzPa/f41agyan4glbxMKPKRygk/GljNfoWy8jeXCLMlR1u aoZcm99HN9gP/IBgScmzlVJ+KRc53LB4vWAF7uI7rebNvK58vghEG0LFpTuRAnmN/VsJ Mmjp1iBz4MAXLQvjvmfBfEyOEg60y/83W3SwCi0Pb5pvu2yBi25N61rosGteKEWh3OsF 4m1gbfUVGGPN/3g2JItepQrKcQU6mfNaoxEgJoY4eRByxgl3T4AeWehY4pSGuWaDx7CV yfnQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.59.11.67 with SMTP id eg3mr55946727ved.31.1356750343081; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:05:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.213.199 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:05:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8276365.58ylrykFZO@porto> References: <1356540147.20663.14.camel@localhost> <20121227143738.4d5ce2dd@pomiocik.lan> <8276365.58ylrykFZO@porto> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:05:42 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2013-01-08 From: Ben Kohler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0ec723f8e3c04d1f50e89 X-Archives-Salt: f30cfe08-cbbe-41f7-a01b-7a00184703db X-Archives-Hash: b80dc8b508c1122cf6725fa058192d06 --047d7bf0ec723f8e3c04d1f50e89 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > 2) Deprecate the 10.0 profiles NOW by removing them from profiles.desc and > putting the new 13.0 profiles there. This has absolutely no effect on > running > installations. > > 3) Make a news item about removal of 10.0 profiles in a year / > ${TIMESCALE}. > > 4) One ${TIMESCALE} later, remove 10.0 profiles. This is the ugly part, and > users need to be warned and prepared properly - here everyone needs an > EAPI5 > capable portage. > This seems like a great time to deprecate & remove the unmaintained server profile target, as has been previously discussed. Is this doable or is that another issue to be tackled another day? -Ben Kohler --047d7bf0ec723f8e3c04d1f50e89 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andreas K. Huettel <<= a href=3D"mailto:dilfridge@gentoo.org" target=3D"_blank">dilfridge@gentoo.o= rg> wrote:
2) Deprecate the 10.0 profiles NOW by removing them from profiles.desc and<= br> putting the new 13.0 profiles there. This has absolutely no effect on runni= ng
installations.

3) Make a news item about removal of 10.0 profiles in a year / ${TIMESCALE}= .

4) One ${TIMESCALE} later, remove 10.0 profiles. This is the ugly part, and=
users need to be warned and prepared properly - here everyone needs an EAPI= 5
capable portage.

This seems like = a great time to deprecate & remove the unmaintained server profile targ= et, as has been previously discussed. =A0Is this doable or is that another = issue to be tackled another day?

-Ben Kohler=A0
--047d7bf0ec723f8e3c04d1f50e89--