From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-57965-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4901386AA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:35:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 456FBE05DD;
	Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:35:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB34E0458
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id dr12so119403wgb.35
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:35:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type
         :x-gm-message-state;
        bh=ZLa0qnADQJU7auQLoxgG96p0MtBrH7rvt5pek6I8dOA=;
        b=jLuloGtspPWDjRN2I/Zu4vgdHLVv2WS1+3joqiV6tnRuNimC7bTsDtYdEebBntJHhD
         1dB0X0/FWFfleFa8USNEZlHpqRWhFLz4wOBFmzYjCTlx5MQ1ktAuqNE7VwgH0tNIHuJt
         pzyCrFu1GymyEENe6MHpndtehE9IK1gIIkIrftKLNuqg3EBRO88mOpYJREUNKDoW/2xL
         orH5mhHVZp9AbfTVXkrX+TC0jUhHOXV2wK/4xapPfzABHaxkW84IcPsX6zP3stskRUFR
         aL8qwvoJFTtBg9t36QfvAHI3N95exTzJapFDjkefynJunnzoRDH+/U1YaI7TyCo7rcfy
         BQCA==
X-Received: by 10.180.107.67 with SMTP id ha3mr1831799wib.2.1359196505699;
 Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:35:05 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: lxnay@sabayonlinux.org
Received: by 10.194.178.7 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:34:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_meOcu5RYT_bMk9aZc+hsmqP48mVp_yEtrmJy96zZc=OQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <robbat2-20130122T032417-835825558Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
 <50FE73F1.6090102@gmail.com> <CAGfcS_=88SEJhewnFiB8M2MUS7S14Lb-DOkxa9M153mseOsudQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <pan.2013.01.24.17.49.05@cox.net> <CAGfcS_k9P_uX16Eh2u+hqHy71VQMmDj-5QxqrcqsZszf4WhwfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <51017B0A.4060608@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_n1ub3xYKtS2WK-ni9JxmTM_xqAOKbdHYoBaSdFOP8RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <510183B2.8020603@orlitzky.com> <5101844B.8070005@gentoo.org>
 <510189CE.3020700@orlitzky.com> <CAGfcS_meOcu5RYT_bMk9aZc+hsmqP48mVp_yEtrmJy96zZc=OQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:34:25 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9m1Rc-AnLVLzZBkASrJ7W591jQk
Message-ID: <CAN3AtvrpRuPux9qqW0mVHUpPbwZqnPV-D2RrjrhB_6Umd9XNkg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS
 fatal by default
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk7TfNWhnJn0y59pPaj62NKNBIl7qnzbb2tPhCFIMUwqRdYzKD9SzG09IawLD98x/W/U1zF
X-Archives-Salt: 5f365854-2cb8-4b7a-a914-1a1d0c6a9c2a
X-Archives-Hash: ff0d372624b92b057de624c7e6a9e7a6

I am starting to think that the real problem is that Gentoo does not
have ebuilds for building kernels (binary kernels). At that point, it
would be easy to add USE flags and virtual packages to solve the
config check problem at the dependencies level once and for all.

-- 
Fabio Erculiani