From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51568-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SSL6W-0004ZJ-2s
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 04:35:52 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDD8DE0A40;
	Thu, 10 May 2012 04:35:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gg0-f181.google.com (mail-gg0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD90EE08A5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 04:34:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ggnl1 with SMTP id l1so835045ggn.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 09 May 2012 21:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :x-gm-message-state;
        bh=D1PbnrdNq3a8oR5t5JGYcPVuN3BV8Ywij9UdDmefc2w=;
        b=p2WMyu4gd5JyeU59AMWY6KjW0q/5EY+lCd8CYuwQ82MrC61QqNJJoEfJzS1AF5PkIi
         grSDbHjVV6oXGWvTZHTzNjjVcGufq8ZaIBwy4EZRnh6Pbbcbn7COqrJOT9vwWAqOKHZg
         Nr1HYKIxjMQ48+5W2+IFHR+6JYWZpUoB0vgzhpfik1J58138kxfPjsUN8EUkKs7Xj/dK
         neFavESQHXq2i+xtNB+j+lDwcoDfBVlhlb1P1M/YmdisES9CAKc2UN+9zWtYujXhSmqm
         gOgp+7zUshlor3X7JwRH0XIC5bVr/p1DvcEm3pKjCjpB35ZZf6b8N5mYBjXw3Lp9f7SH
         RJow==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.45.197 with SMTP id p5mr1367397igm.73.1336624488926; Wed,
 09 May 2012 21:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: lxnay@sabayonlinux.org
Received: by 10.231.37.77 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 21:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120509223630.GA29213@kroah.com>
References: <4F85E21C.4060106@gentoo.org>
	<jmvr06$96o$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<CAGfcS_nPz=6kGg49kwZ-6GGAeB0fixzUQxyyXbU8-bbO0ndKng@mail.gmail.com>
	<jn04lk$q2i$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<20120423012540.GA2130@waltdnes.org>
	<jo0q2n$ebp$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<20120505010529.GD22763@kroah.com>
	<jo9t9m$aql$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com>
	<CAN3AtvrbJ0d6itGchoAMW4VfEVBvGWH=W8heULjJrLzCeF-g2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120509223630.GA29213@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 06:34:48 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: oPC2z2X17AuOzm1hxu5_aehB-G8
Message-ID: <CAN3Atvqaohtht_+oGtnrU7-RDeEAJ-pLQdQKf-4zFV-iCHxbPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting
 summary for 3 April 2012]
From: Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3cHrkEfqhP/b1JlhNlEP7N5KJYuVo3U4i/kixvnk8r1OITXKLKVQtu/Pj7DEfPFMnRZpW
X-Archives-Salt: d0ee1acf-af82-48e1-8e99-2a078d1fe2e0
X-Archives-Hash: ed2a62aefcd9e4930436d4adfc221cdd

I think expressing my own opinion about Lennart-made software is my
right, after all.
Firstly, it's almost impossible nowadays to avoid including avahi,
systemd and pulseaudio into a desktop distro so, there is no real
choice. This issue became a sensible matter for those users who for
instance, wanted to have a silly mp3 player working without going
through the PA nonsense, really missing the old
ALSA-oh-it-was-always-working days.
If you want to bring complexity but you end up not being able to
handle it, then you're not a really good engineer, IMHO.

Having said that, I also wonder where's the lovely modularity the
various *nix platforms had. If this is the actual direction of Linux
Foundation, Redhat and Canonical, I am worried that Linux would end up
being an OSX-wannabe.

Of course, I am not only bringing my personal opinion here, but the
one of the majority of users I've been talking with.
I am not against changes, I am actually in favor of them, but only
when they really make sense and solve problems, which it doesn't seem
the case lately.

I didn't want to offend anyone, but just having fun (sigh) of IMHO bad
design decisions.
-- 
Fabio Erculiani