From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-64282-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF9C138247
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:32:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E7E6E0A99;
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:32:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294F0E09EE
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:32:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id cc10so753414wib.11
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 01:32:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=fTtIT8lEsk8v+jbvmX2QTQM3PM8YxPE0B1GdWdIm36E=;
b=DMGGG+zqzUtdOq6zk/guTxhaKQRkxbkXNoUZ/+NY4deT5BVZ27yncKBbC02uvCkzZA
38diHm3jqyM9W3m7cgvGQx8M+z8E3VAMiRuybagF0qj7NtWOBGaebCc2tllc+3o2wDfI
jdoWY4UelJpNzjjczx9DwNqks+SOZLOrn/ThE09onV7Wau++ewkuAix9/qs6D7EGF3IY
N7zkLrp+CHBFj/n+8Jf9d+tj3+Br33K/TpJyS2RsU+l3LhEVPPO3oGFqay47ULlar8rG
dAw1QYRawqjabw2mikrk3mBTCNJcLyE2OxZDCAhjMwDIWs5uApPqnwX1vWkd4x+QCZ/3
Wl0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk88Hr5+nT2cfO1MMv5PvuoIgDHE1YNHWjfOxtYM2Ow25vYtCqAn2cYhu4mHAMNe66dCK1I
X-Received: by 10.180.75.115 with SMTP id b19mr14343325wiw.19.1389605556786;
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 01:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: lxnay@sabayonlinux.org
Received: by 10.194.83.193 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 01:31:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52D3AEB9.7080500@pathscale.com>
References: <1388986435.17870.49.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca>
<1389582464.7103.185.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <20140113083917.5427344.53422.41690@pathscale.com>
<52D3A71F.9040602@plaimi.net> <52D3AEB9.7080500@pathscale.com>
From: Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:31:56 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: LGBRmpDNGSWVKjzSPFX4ycj9Sfg
Message-ID: <CAN3AtvqZyWsLethMUPBbh7B3zVvHSgN+kN63uynkDvef__1rCg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 40844eb8-87d3-49d1-80c9-4cb5a9bcbb85
X-Archives-Hash: c1431af470522e7d08e9963e37e75468
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, "C. Bergstr=C3=B6m"
<cbergstrom@pathscale.com> wrote:
> On 01/13/14 03:43 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> Where I work uses pkgcore[1], but not the areas which are generally
> beneficial to the whole community. (We use it as part of a web applicatio=
n
> to handle testsuites which have build dependencies.) We can blah blah abo=
ut
> performance of resolving package dependencies all day long,
> [...]
Not sure about what you mean with "blah blah". But given the amount of
both disk caches (metadata, vdb cache) and memory caches (the
in-memory aux_db cache that portage loads using pickle (it's a dict)
takes like 70-100Mb of RAM on an average desktop system), Portage can
still take *minutes* to calculate the merge queue of a pkg with all
its deps satisfied. Ironically, launching the same emerge command
twice, will take more or less the same time.
Yeah, this is probably bad design...
--=20
Fabio Erculiani