From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE611381FA for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 19:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADA3FE084D; Sat, 31 May 2014 19:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F47DE0838 for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 19:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id cc10so2731902wib.4 for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 12:51:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ifusb8x2dVCQ4o4f3lURnu6R4GyVsOc/At5VE4JyHeE=; b=kwXFyZ6o8F7IUn0IHrWe8jNwdVOZ0y8WfWimpZqaDJhsUFtTY3a5Esz8/JGGUCI/Z1 Y2OwxkTAUMvW7jRENjRl+f9kY/rGZhTrmihgue8U9d3DbYKybxljXgEa9qxVQUOk3F6I nIbqI1NGkRUst6KV74JaqVHJg8Cyui7kLglOg/qkuqOYiKdCkkpI7uLu1pJLI9y0kuaa iS/NnGW0s8CBFSWa+qSKE77L3H+xNDa9wWRGgniKesMzYOkFR1yNFpfvm00ozs3YHKrE FQ6EcQPiEVf9WOzn5/Ysb0F6iVF4K/PXfFJns4MiUbp8Yj7Ohm0V2xEqZnQ3mu6clInx BnHw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk9zwCQMB8OTvzjJN9VR9kJFDr9Zt1yOEVXeYJfzgCZV6xFm4g0PwJope9mV0o0kdWzpwV4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.84.101 with SMTP id x5mr35077096wjy.52.1401565899373; Sat, 31 May 2014 12:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lxnay@sabayonlinux.org Received: by 10.194.86.6 with HTTP; Sat, 31 May 2014 12:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.86.6 with HTTP; Sat, 31 May 2014 12:51:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <53889F70.1090404@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 20:51:39 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BMSJkqI10PZa1CRmp9mEPwb343g Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? From: Fabio Erculiani To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04dce8fd7e204fab77d88 X-Archives-Salt: 2f907c58-8de7-489d-be6d-78fd4388fba0 X-Archives-Hash: 7cceec6cf35951b3b3d5590d840b320e --047d7bb04dce8fd7e204fab77d88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On May 31, 2014 8:42 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings, > > ... to genkernel repository for: > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828 > > > > I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :( > My excuse is AFK baby, literally sleeping on me right now, and not even > 2 months old. > > I saw floppym's original comment opening the bug, but none of the > followups due to baby eating my life. > > I'll apply this patch later today if I have a chance, but I do agree > with the general sentiment of this thread that the kernel configs NEED > to get out of genkernel; so that arches can touch them at will, and > other initramfs/kernel build tools can start to use them. > > In the absence of any other prompt complaints, I'll create a > kernel-configs repo, and move the configs there. It would be better if those would be put in individual source pkgs in a way that they can be picked up by genkernel. Kernel config belongs to kernel pkgs, pretty much like init scripts or config files belong to their own project pkgs. > > The one thing that WILL have to be maintained in genkernel still, and > in-sync with kernel changes, are the modules_load files, esp when new > common stuff is added to the kernel (disk controllers & filesystems most > commonly). > > -- > Robin Hugh Johnson > Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead > E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org > GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 > --047d7bb04dce8fd7e204fab77d88 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On May 31, 2014 8:42 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mail= s, pings,
> > ... to genkernel repository for:
> >
> > http= s://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D461828
> >
> > I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :(
> My excuse is AFK baby, literally sleeping on me right now, and not eve= n
> 2 months old.
>
> I saw floppym's original comment opening the bug, but none of the<= br> > followups due to baby eating my life.
>
> I'll apply this patch later today if I have a chance, but I do agr= ee
> with the general sentiment of this thread that the kernel configs NEED=
> to get out of genkernel; so that arches can touch them at will, and > other initramfs/kernel build tools can start to use them.
>
> In the absence of any other prompt complaints, I'll create a
> kernel-configs repo, and move the configs there.

It would be better if those would be put in individual sourc= e pkgs in a way that they can be picked up by genkernel. Kernel config belo= ngs to kernel pkgs, pretty much like init scripts or config files belong to= their own project pkgs.

>
> The one thing that WILL have to be maintained in genkernel still, and<= br> > in-sync with kernel changes, are the modules_load files, =C2=A0esp whe= n new
> common stuff is added to the kernel (disk controllers & filesystem= s most
> commonly).
>
> --
> Robin Hugh Johnson
> Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead
> E-Mail =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : robbat2@g= entoo.org
> GnuPG FP =C2=A0 : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
>

--047d7bb04dce8fd7e204fab77d88--