From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFD81381F3 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE04EE0B41; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFB9AE0B3B for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ey16so4463277wid.1 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:04:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=oVffLojafH1WEqqnWqO00DNalUsCW+cFG3V3zEB7jBo=; b=Nn3W+9ZDxWV0mvuYT0YxjDb3Gv/e8FpYeh9xrJmye+8fOsbNyRHq8Ww7DbxNbz3/ky 5yjAyz7Smmz6PCBOQ/EEEcd5XuN3T+GBtedyuCPqZcuAGWYZ/xiJ/jyqs+BxTr+Qeyme TuOQCCj5h+GQybLpU3/MCRLlnSo9TEq1mZjxuyvDnSmdzAI0gVY8WHG5FqJRz3X+jxZ8 KtNlwIUYmJhbOvd0a1BSyjHUY93uFjeM0DwYBnc9b+pDRylHH/NJ6kAGXRtxTsX+ulP6 D0Sw/4ziIk8Jn4YKCfyXcUJVNs7f/JixcBbzTRRltuM4pe4Hz9nKFWt/szDnegCbg/kE yGRg== X-Received: by 10.180.75.144 with SMTP id c16mr15951399wiw.1.1372709066508; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:04:26 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lxnay@sabayonlinux.org Received: by 10.194.23.10 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:03:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1372708771.8880.1.camel@localhost> References: <20130701164149.131490f8@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <51D1CADB.4030503@gentoo.org> <20130701192436.GB30808@kroah.com> <20130701214040.1d6ce0a1@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1372708771.8880.1.camel@localhost> From: Fabio Erculiani Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 22:03:46 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ki3mVQtIVh7obivuRLgJeG0SA1g Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration. To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmNt1HAP6wveEpCjD0meCmYueMCcuI3GtK7vuVqygPS7NkWGr9Qt85kLW2/1YRAXcuxUnD5 X-Archives-Salt: a581070a-6c60-40d5-83ec-4121e387984a X-Archives-Hash: 5ee05f61164751b41dc366e10cccdeac On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 01-07-2013 a las 21:55 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribi=C3=B3: >> I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds >> (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather >> than all this. >> > > I don't see them exclusionary, look different issues to me :/ (with > completely different solutions I think) Of course I'm not saying that they're not orthogonal. OTOH I believe that the complexity of supporting something like this (the original proposal) is not linear. However, I don't see any problem with people implementing it btw... it's their time. > > --=20 Fabio Erculiani