From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-57859-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1128138623
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:33:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 421D1E0675;
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:33:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3E1E0667
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:33:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id k13so13492137iea.22
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:33:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=4GWS3PFp8iRoiK1Go8Gt6vSjATd8P6mb61lWnq+9SHE=;
b=j060QTi9CNof/EuiKbHZOPoJKy5iHgoPiSBS0/7LqZHi9o0pnfHn0cujKRuLIkMpYJ
4AKdAdnPyXHYHultPiv27x0nIyFINNwva6mMw2P3JTB03OWdQBPq2KfF8sJTCYhOhdvO
4lkbpR5YeYUa07tdls6FGzztIamxzSVrxYzIjGUipIJgpfhkehdELN8Nr7fOEAdL43cn
mZrk8ehjykMTNrpJJr3lrEaLVZ6AkzfzCXuNCQIqWuADls566mNS6wlrO5iOJKE0CPFM
nKPUnEbyMs8nKx7g4tOfYdsoj6kvc2Rw2GCccdQ2mML4ZaLjykxJmuyD2we+ZdM338rR
bOZw==
X-Received: by 10.50.169.106 with SMTP id ad10mr14806310igc.88.1358944401626;
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:33:21 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: lxnay@sabayonlinux.org
Received: by 10.42.32.68 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:32:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <robbat2-20130122T183602-830732178Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
References: <robbat2-20130122T032417-835825558Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
<50FE1425.2040900@gentoo.org> <50FE302A.1040600@gentoo.org>
<50FEA78A.70806@gentoo.org> <robbat2-20130122T183602-830732178Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
From: Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:32:40 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aMIzju4gzAkne4lmCWkaiSRQD9A
Message-ID: <CAN3AtvoJqQSvQYO=LMkqVv5n_vA-m623M6XtFR8KLR3hNDexUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal
by default
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlBo6TJQc/JnrfHRW7xFwBEkdigVhPQWe0Y4fLevAwil1jRjD80tc2nBhCrVRQ341aWcM2H
X-Archives-Salt: 0b538a04-d8bd-4a20-974c-ded6e41fb5f3
X-Archives-Hash: 333b4a84f311af8271af87e256b43d77
I hope this is going to be binary package manager friendly.
In Sabayon for instance, kernel sources are not even installed and at
the same time, /proc/config.gz may not even be available.
There were some corner cases in where pkg_setup failed because this
kernel config check stuff was trying to be "smarter" than the user.
--
Fabio Erculiani