From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SDurp-0007oQ-Go for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:45:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 799F1E0E30; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA25E0E27 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenq2 with SMTP id q2so893942yen.40 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 02:44:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nnsP8GChoetRTA6CaUZUZVXwQ3yJxjcFuk25gQ96WuM=; b=R/7w37lBqMi0A+IiDJK2PNxeorMsF++H7KtshR46EThYp7NAjJLbJShnB+VnmMiTGD EN092o2ikzJA1BZ19+li5Ud9QW7YasudoBYzF0xIoumkBvavJzW0m1K1rNdAonzes8p1 650WDmFGBwzOKP2skrrOLvCf2TdtkAfVrFZkVEq30CdA5xWzZO6RgLGr+g9wYR2ni2Wm EahQXgIe/kfetgcV9g6m/rPMeAqorhLWB7i7PBJHtsJC0QxPgcMjODtFyp+JOQ3kjFod YZtI5ySM8+WKw2bJWHQMJtOr6HewTiIU0L+RR1TU7uBgqkd+ASj7SjhmZq/eLa50OlRe Zt5Q== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.145.193 with SMTP id p41mr1128485yhj.124.1333187043764; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 02:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.136.136 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 02:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.136.136 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 02:44:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120331085622.5650ca62@googlemail.com> References: <20120330150041.c3f7684c.axel@james-b.ch> <4F75B45F.2050108@gentoo.org> <4F76226B.1020507@gentoo.org> <4F762BCF.9010204@cs.stonybrook.edu> <20120331085622.5650ca62@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Happy 10th birthday (in advance) From: Alex Alexander To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30426db829aa5104bc86cca4 X-Archives-Salt: 7153fc1f-7c43-4cdb-8774-ea307cb05106 X-Archives-Hash: 6fb9157295bf9c3a48622de377ad28e2 --20cf30426db829aa5104bc86cca4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mar 31, 2012 11:00 AM, "Ciaran McCreesh" wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:55:27 -0400 > Richard Yao wrote: > > I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we > > declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I > > think claiming 2.0 would be merited, if only for the attention it > > would draw at Phoronix. > > Do you really want to be advertising an awful hack that doesn't really > work, is conceptually unsound and that breaks all kinds of things in > subtle ways? > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh @preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production boxes for years without any issues :) Alex | wired --20cf30426db829aa5104bc86cca4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mar 31, 2012 11:00 AM, "Ciaran McCreesh" <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:55:27 -0400
> Richard Yao <ryao@cs.stonybrook.edu> wrote:
> > I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we
> > declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I
> > think claiming 2.0 would be merited, if only for the attention it
> > would draw at Phoronix.
>
> Do you really want to be advertising an awful hack that doesn't really
> work, is conceptually unsound and that breaks all kinds of things in
> subtle ways?
>
> --
> Ciaran McCreesh

@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production boxes for years without any issues :)

Alex | wired

--20cf30426db829aa5104bc86cca4--