From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50061-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1S5fxZ-0007bz-AR
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:12:57 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F291E077C;
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 16:12:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC070E0684
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 16:12:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ggni4 with SMTP id i4so346119ggn.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:12:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=mTMkz2HIcVOdSCplldU5iS1NoLfEnPuB56k5d03xhbE=;
b=PxPAGm5AnSKYs6+Gn8CTSQ6FlaNalyVQPgoljwX5WGPQh0RxMp13eVYlyKs8RDWPS3
/Xn98ZroITUv7CRsQizwIu3KhVcX7p7RQ7C8/Gb78vxN+kwruIK9Xnhg2HrQUsxfmHR9
0zIEFxj51R90Xwe211m9vWe99HYUAVUkDb7Fb+9u9pKtuyTGivz63R1IJijbV5XX3wHW
0ZfVWJ4fK5rUrzxIOOdbFu+dCWgk1dA2Qo1Dev0m3wfjKAOMueSNoZAzHZBZ4NbMi/6y
5ODq4gcQPS33vxNPdAm6eGGo0jX/8oNoreyCUMqRc56sDEHxnFn49ia1DqH0X9fyKq7c
SKhQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.245.27 with SMTP id s27mr3437749anh.62.1331223120051; Thu,
08 Mar 2012 08:12:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.147.89.9 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:11:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F58CFE3.8070408@gentoo.org>
References: <20311.51166.725757.212932@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
<CAAr7Pr9BSRNJtnx=iRZJpcOdE+kMGHN-44uOn7FpA1A-DtZqaQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20312.24445.451487.577826@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
<CAAr7Pr9HSxsDePhAKFvXPpK5U8NhdXADMAm79b7cW7Tf_QkW4w@mail.gmail.com>
<4F58CFE3.8070408@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 16:11:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CALc3eMX_x1bvkFebNOx9DLOW3KzmpTD2UAdYdVmqbFQx0wYrGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
From: David Leverton <levertond@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: f9556944-1949-4aed-8d36-b5d89fb49e50
X-Archives-Hash: a8e9f771550e31428c8a51df5647b9cc
On Mar 8, 2012 3:29 PM, "Zac Medico" <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Something like DEPEND="foo bar" is also valid bash, and yet we don't
> allow that either because "foo bar" does not contain valid dependency
> atoms.
There's a bit of a difference between caring about the value of a
variable and caring about what syntax was used to assign it....