From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F1E1381F3 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 18:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36640E0924; Wed, 1 May 2013 18:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-da0-f45.google.com (mail-da0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38669E091B for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 18:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f45.google.com with SMTP id v40so765868dad.4 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 11:25:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zF2f+e+7NwaZzr1J1yU5ejoPxvWC2ERKGkiTv0qNQFg=; b=POIHXyy1W0IMTIi2sJW8dMpRwf24r+oJjAUDTendgr8xrRaBxNjRdIGcSDV+wRz3Iq xD76J/81AcHBj9xxR3uz+hi61AFwLNTR8FS5jKzFC34fLioa3Pv1BVW4t8cfQHiddU0u 7pHtwBmEm/l/ZQFXElDkzGCZdg5XVoD0RcahQr4rQ3lUe29SD5kOLspr6mqHke5sI3DC 43CctTN78KEZwvC+Q+jF+7AVlsVjCWSJZFJFGctE693x9aOrQjrg6iZRUDoTRjHDDfDN HJpTrd6q8Y4OZIXWgEx3L/Ewx1rB5gmg2n06bgU3ZoCcEP8YsDwpD66RaHZN9n+m5b4j D2RQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.44.169 with SMTP id f9mr5398051pbm.29.1367432706839; Wed, 01 May 2013 11:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.22.99 with HTTP; Wed, 1 May 2013 11:25:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130430195203.0af69d0e@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> References: <20130429075549.06e8ad66@gentoo.org> <201304291436.42577.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130429194917.46d4985c@googlemail.com> <20862.56778.599974.921136@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130429215950.019cd23b@googlemail.com> <20862.62111.902255.208565@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130429232709.6d755604@googlemail.com> <20130430121213.330244bc@googlemail.com> <20130430195203.0af69d0e@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 19:25:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520f5f7bed9ef04dbac3cf7 X-Archives-Salt: 8ea4ebdb-bb89-48c1-a63f-f470d202a9ae X-Archives-Hash: f2a4786d25e489964bc890ec99eb786e --bcaec520f5f7bed9ef04dbac3cf7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 1 May 2013 02:52, Ryan Hill wrote: > Then the person implementing the code for Paludis is either a monkey or a > robot*. > > *or both (?!) > Alternative possibilities include ninja, zombie and wizard. --bcaec520f5f7bed9ef04dbac3cf7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 1= May 2013 02:52, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:<= br>
Then the person implementing the code for Paludis is either a monkey or a robot*.

*or both (?!)

Alternative possibilities= include ninja, zombie and wizard.

--bcaec520f5f7bed9ef04dbac3cf7--