From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S7wUX-0001ho-Qx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:16:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 638BBE09DA; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f52.google.com (mail-yw0-f52.google.com [209.85.213.52]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E92E0887 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhpp61 with SMTP id p61so2925793yhp.11 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:14:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k1W9DwT7dlUThAVTBaPN4O2TiBDkiqRT5s6zuYyR4zE=; b=UCz9QiahPuEPw/8EwR0uaLQrJGrqO2GcEQXYb1aMY3V9CGkPZaRXS6zvrw1r39jXG5 Trg3irWEoUCZq0QmuWLaKrASIklf1uw684QqfvRqqLOW2e8ONeWsQYq/TKKdeXEHSSwI X3J985CujFNwPD7pMPcfLxmblC6OFlFsljQ7RM5LpxdQ85rlmMqagGiPWsCcQcukze78 gkYIlfohtdBWQejXnQA9/jL72KqtrCyPiK/XXrQ1uCqqaH++JC0fadt2TqGuGFZSYYlK 79aDrPwTEAe8X7/4HOFUadug30EwwlfXGT6ZvYWGQPbZhNq+WAKacY9Kkh4eoxyrJ+CL wO2A== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.153.36 with SMTP id e24mr5159680yhk.67.1331763294424; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.86.14 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:14:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120314210456.GB11179@kroah.com> References: <20120314145144.GC3200@ca.inter.net> <20120314150431.GA2033@kroah.com> <20120314150827.53dc8336@googlemail.com> <20120314152209.GA2157@kroah.com> <4F60D585.4050206@gentoo.org> <4F60E9C1.7050600@gentoo.org> <20120314210456.GB11179@kroah.com> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:14:54 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 86c00a6a-e3ff-4a30-820a-5bd72ed032ec X-Archives-Hash: 33f5a954e94e7cb831e9b64f8f73aff3 On 14 March 2012 21:04, Greg KH wrote: > Haveing a separate /usr is wonderful, and once we finish moving /sbin/ > and /bin/ into /usr/ it makes even more sense. =C2=A0See the /usr page at > fedora for all of the great reasons why this is good. My point was examine, in detail, whether separate-/usr-with-initramfs has any disadvantages compared to separate-/usr-without-initramfs. Either it has, in which case we have a concrete argument against requiring initramfs (albeit possibly one that can be fixed), or it hasn't, which should hopefully convince at least some people to accept it.