From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S7ygl-0002ML-3t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:37:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67BB5E0B7B; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63688E0B5C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhjj72 with SMTP id j72so3088324yhj.40 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:36:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=57QdfrLmOqY3QwH9mglV0qltLgK5Iku78ECq2iBbPuQ=; b=D/8ynDK+8Tpm/SD6SZz0gYelxNLbCVkSXxCDQA47QOSEvBaGettKPFuXWwYT5etSbT JtEL9iNKKhDDbG8jr7GlARS/OV4Onmo7rgFYjqhKC7QLuVBAhQU37F3gyNQECzaCnW8S v8Y+/eoDdbHKgEIt8fRZoKkMZzFR/ShLm14LFterTVF63TMIls9q00dBBP8y5GbeE/0j FvJkLlaQBJ8Za4vcn/TL6m3yV9CMC/FlLo/iS5IaICVaRsLoy4mewX94YNkRvps2aqf4 W/Ibj77VyFFICStBv6UDGDycuQF9uD6kcSlGDtYQNVB4dN7K+NaHCwQqRFAyl5O9Rnp+ 1Gyg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.173.202 with SMTP id v50mr5596734yhl.102.1331771777944; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.86.14 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:36:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F612E09.1090900@gentoo.org> References: <20120314150827.53dc8336@googlemail.com> <20120314152209.GA2157@kroah.com> <4F60D585.4050206@gentoo.org> <4F60E9C1.7050600@gentoo.org> <20120314210456.GB11179@kroah.com> <20120314225117.GB12279@kroah.com> <4F612E09.1090900@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:36:17 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: a601b505-6bed-4629-96d5-aef2e1200370 X-Archives-Hash: 0dddbdaac3f4c19fcfeb7af4f4606b9d On 14 March 2012 23:47, Zac Medico wrote: > It's more about what we're _not_ doing that what we're doing. Clearly something must have changed in udev 181 to make /usr-without-initramfs not work anymore, and someone must have done something to make that change happen, unless udev has aquired the ability to evolve by itself.