From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51903-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SXUAk-0007eJ-F5
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 09:17:36 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C84C7E0AA2;
Thu, 24 May 2012 09:17:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B82DE09D8
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 09:16:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so6538543vbb.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 02:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type;
bh=V97JINvC8MpRiRiqW6pjCCm1FGLN8HUfmODQ8FYaD4I=;
b=lwisGrNijh+k1z8qNAJzWMv/8pFP8Z/vjfuJ+2EPu7dMeFz8Dx7i6VFq4WLW97ikF2
D9niheqHZIMLm2gn+oLivEX+G7irP0Jz3yv5o9pHBtunNK6b4Wlt9dU6rg7YLbG61RvB
DWGg0xdPoFVdWEXQ1rxCk1JxiJgDumZqVM2iF+4s2de1jNw2Adncolt9mcx3A+nryvrR
ioHrnL/6cNB9acJ+wsxPaNKj5OsZ2TW8+b22yjeUg2lBZ64+mfSVPcMX7UrB+9/vsJxh
11UHQfD3N6mai/enPZAC5eGTwoh4a+CD+X71tfaFXn1h4sHpmArl7pOJ73DAhC8IQK1I
nS3Q==
Received: by 10.52.100.36 with SMTP id ev4mr14485545vdb.43.1337850982183; Thu,
24 May 2012 02:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.54.6 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 02:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5715947.t4S3h9H3z4@smorgbox>
References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org> <2887754.yItCG0zenD@smorgbox>
<pan.2012.05.24.06.33.53@cox.net> <5715947.t4S3h9H3z4@smorgbox>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=EDtor_Brand=E3o?= <vitorbrandao.pt@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:16:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKqTOYfPyX6RagiwJQWvy3kCA2E6-4YX2j1dhPC0o42PVChwHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071c6968e320504c0c4b4ae
X-Archives-Salt: ff1f1f24-85a1-4a97-8f78-8ef466109733
X-Archives-Hash: 3b1c1d665694b22cc4a752cb427cf82c
--20cf3071c6968e320504c0c4b4ae
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2012/5/24 Dan Douglas <ormaaj@gmail.com>
> On Thursday, May 24, 2012 06:33:53 AM Duncan wrote:
> > Dan Douglas posted on Thu, 24 May 2012 01:04:48 -0500 as excerpted:
> > > On Thursday, May 24, 2012 07:56:58 AM Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:14:53 -0500
> > >>
> > >> Dan Douglas <ormaaj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > If not I will be leaving Gentoo for Funtoo in the near future,
> though
> > >> > there are disadvantages to doing this I don't look forward to
> dealing
> > >> > with.
> > >>
> > >> Most of us will probably be doing that :P.
> > >
> > > Eh sorry that wasn't meant to be antagonistic. I'll still have Gentoo
> > > boxen to deal with. I just need to be able to use git on the tree (ev=
en
> > > without the full history is perfectly fine) to ease the difficulty of
> > > local overlay management. Glad to hear that will be possible, or at
> > > least somewhat easier.
> >
> > FWIW, I as a user would sure like a git-based tree. Doing git
> whatchanged
> > searches on individual files and being able to track my last checkout a=
nd
> > roll back to it, or to a point between it and current HEAD, are extreme=
ly
> > useful. I haven't thought of it much until now, but I think maintainin=
g
> > overlays as simple branches would be great, as well.
>
> I don't think doing a branch of the entire tree is a good idea (well
> maybe...). I was thinking more along the lines of subtree merges into a
> local
> overlay, or perhaps submodules. To do that currently (I think) would
> require
> taking the rsync tree and putting that into a repo, and trying to keep it
> synchronized. Plus in the process you lose all correspondance with upstre=
am
> commits so that logs and diffs become meaningless.
> --
> Dan Douglas
git++
--=20
V=C3=ADtor Brand=C3=A3o (noisebleed)
--20cf3071c6968e320504c0c4b4ae
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">2012/5/24 Dan Douglas <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a h=
ref=3D"mailto:ormaaj@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">ormaaj@gmail.com</a>><=
/span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bord=
er-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class=3D"im">On Thursday, May 24, 2012 06:33:53 AM Duncan wrote:<br>
> Dan Douglas posted on Thu, 24 May 2012 01:04:48 -0500 as excerpted:<br=
>
> > On Thursday, May 24, 2012 07:56:58 AM Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrot=
e:<br>
> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:14:53 -0500<br>
> >><br>
> >> Dan Douglas <<a href=3D"mailto:ormaaj@gmail.com">ormaaj@gm=
ail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> > If not I will be leaving Gentoo for Funtoo in the near f=
uture, though<br>
> >> > there are disadvantages to doing this I don't look f=
orward to dealing<br>
> >> > with.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Most of us will probably be doing that :P.<br>
> ><br>
> > Eh sorry that wasn't meant to be antagonistic. I'll still=
have Gentoo<br>
> > boxen to deal with. I just need to be able to use git on the tree=
(even<br>
> > without the full history is perfectly fine) to ease the difficult=
y of<br>
> > local overlay management. Glad to hear that will be possible, or =
at<br>
> > least somewhat easier.<br>
><br>
> FWIW, I as a user would sure like a git-based tree. =C2=A0Doing git wh=
atchanged<br>
> searches on individual files and being able to track my last checkout =
and<br>
> roll back to it, or to a point between it and current HEAD, are extrem=
ely<br>
> useful. =C2=A0I haven't thought of it much until now, but I think =
maintaining<br>
> overlays as simple branches would be great, as well.<br>
<br>
</div>I don't think doing a branch of the entire tree is a good idea (w=
ell<br>
maybe...). I was thinking more along the lines of subtree merges into a loc=
al<br>
overlay, or perhaps submodules. To do that currently (I think) would requir=
e<br>
taking the rsync tree and putting that into a repo, and trying to keep it<b=
r>
synchronized. Plus in the process you lose all correspondance with upstream=
<br>
commits so that logs and diffs become meaningless.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">--<br>
Dan Douglas</font></span></blockquote></div><br><div>git++</div><div><br></=
div><div>--=C2=A0</div><div>V=C3=ADtor Brand=C3=A3o =C2=A0(noisebleed)</div=
>
--20cf3071c6968e320504c0c4b4ae--