From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951F5138206 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EF38E0900; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224BCE08AE for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com (mail-wr0-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE347335C42 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id t16so1603538wrc.10 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 05:54:45 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfFumZ3XZjV9eN07+eWKO1JifLLqKR2HldYP8f9Pb1YegOIaC3m /Lm7nP74RTRW1WVrHL4zCyLlhghCTEYk8MUYTCY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovqQUKX8MFV3sTaXTslaxR1YMvZaS/DYgNM00xBjo4A0BfaGre/7NhI9LSkadycJ6T6TP8tL/m7W8bIzWnPRjA= X-Received: by 10.223.163.91 with SMTP id d27mr6712095wrb.18.1516110882880; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 05:54:42 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.58.10 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 05:54:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1516097941.1598.10.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1516053701.952.9.camel@gentoo.org> <1516097941.1598.10.camel@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:54:22 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering To: Gentoo Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f21569d43970562e51276" X-Archives-Salt: f9abe2d9-79de-4e3f-a5f3-528c467026e6 X-Archives-Hash: e17cdcb495f5051aee23f6cbaa8b790b --f403045f21569d43970562e51276 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > I disagree. I think most of the developers are used to the lexical sort, > and it keeps the order predictable. While I suppose keeping amd64 > and x86 alongside for the sake of being commonly used would make sense, > I really have no clue how that would affect other arches. > It is a trade-off, of course. My hypothesis is that it would be easier to use. > By 'frequency' did you mean how many ebuilds are having the specific > keyword? Could you make some quick stats that would show how this would > look like right now? > Here's an estimation of the relative frequencies: amd64 (37201) x86 (33703) ppc (15347) arm (14387) ppc64 (11647) sparc (10054) alpha (9219) ia64 (8456) hppa (8410) arm64 (8194) amd64-linux (7716) mips (7602) x86-linux (7409) x86-fbsd (6102) sh (4885) s390 (4421) ppc-macos (4098) x86-macos (4028) amd64-fbsd (3361) x86-solaris (3202) x64-macos (3187) sparc-solaris (2464) x64-solaris (2208) m68k (2204) sparc64-solaris (1344) arm-linux (1135) ppc-aix (971) sparc-fbsd (902) m68k-mint (626) x64-cygwin (432) x86-winnt (123) x86-interix (5) x86-cygwin (5) ia64-hpux (5) ppc64-linux (4) arm64-linux (4) x86-freebsd (1) Regards, Dirkjan --f403045f21569d43970562e51276 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= ue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <= mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
I = disagree. I think most of the developers are used to the lexical sort,
and it keeps the order predictable. While I suppose keeping amd64
and x86 alongside for the sake of being commonly used would make sense,
I really have no clue how that would affect other arches.
<= div>
By 'frequency' did you mean how many ebuilds are having the specifi= c
keyword? Could you make some quick stats that would show how this would
look like right now?



--f403045f21569d43970562e51276--