From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C7C1381F3 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3B8BE0973; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E98DCE081B for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (mail-pb0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A4FB33E742 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rr13so14629118pbb.20 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:35:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=CfppWyeYo193WJ0NXlX6yBn2dNzYX9dJS3TvofdrNJ0=; b=ZYCMPyHvSn+lzVwTUJmdWEyLY+qG+tyEnTJ0LAX5UTwNjRdh0yQHHXJI0BDwdDRUpi 00rng938yT7l9lpzfnWxqq5648qexXpxCPC1u8uFqg6XoW7CkBJ3f1XyFQSzH2ifHm2E /LJI4ckvCDeFFnnYMGin6CAAYxXSeqALviRgQ1ivqm5srtW7ZZ09ZY6enT5UILwPge/u VqJhUEzwe4AjURWxMgeQ1Tays4nzb3YCNl8EpXtffHUQP8UfIDZZnrGhYcklYaGlzZVq 1ADOtQA6N46oR11d3F3grsQ2oPKkc1YHFMQZcpvbLPuLvgULEW5u3Qv3zjUF2RyZ9jAT 6p5w== X-Received: by 10.68.1.226 with SMTP id 2mr2244122pbp.150.1372275339175; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.70.19.139 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:35:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51CB39CC.7090609@gentoo.org> References: <51CB39CC.7090609@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:35:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About m68k arch status in perl packages To: Gentoo Development Cc: perl@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 75dd54ef-aa0b-477c-99a6-ffb6df73de4c X-Archives-Hash: b8ce77324dd591fa1d9b0e261970fd1d On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > Hi all. We have very long delay with m68k arch in many stabilization > bugs, especially in perl-related. I think this is not ok. The only one > mk68k developer is vapier, so i want say: if we'll have no progress in > stabilization for m68k for a two weeks, i'll close all bugs, that have > m68k as last arch (i have no hardware to test it) and drop related > keyword in package to unstable. IIRC we've had discussions in the past about making m68k permanently ~arch-only, like mips. Cheers, Dirkjan