public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] The end of net-zope
@ 2012-02-29  8:51 Dirkjan Ochtman
  2012-02-29 19:42 ` Pacho Ramos
  2012-03-01 18:50 ` Mike Gilbert
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2012-02-29  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo Development

Tomorrow, March 1, is the deadline for removing almost all of the
Zope/Plone packages from the portage tree (those who still want them
can get them from Arfrever's Progress overlay).

Since only one or two packages would remain in the category, do we
want the category to stay around, or should it be removed from the
tree? We could move the remaining packages to dev-python.

Similarly, there is an empty herd. Do we have a procedure for
end-of-lifeing herds?

Cheers,

Dirkjan



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] The end of net-zope
  2012-02-29  8:51 [gentoo-dev] The end of net-zope Dirkjan Ochtman
@ 2012-02-29 19:42 ` Pacho Ramos
  2012-03-01 18:50 ` Mike Gilbert
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2012-02-29 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 713 bytes --]

El mié, 29-02-2012 a las 09:51 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman escribió:
> Tomorrow, March 1, is the deadline for removing almost all of the
> Zope/Plone packages from the portage tree (those who still want them
> can get them from Arfrever's Progress overlay).
> 
> Since only one or two packages would remain in the category, do we
> want the category to stay around, or should it be removed from the
> tree? We could move the remaining packages to dev-python.
> 
> Similarly, there is an empty herd. Do we have a procedure for
> end-of-lifeing herds?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dirkjan
> 
> 

You can see here how we dropped a herd last time from retirement:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401169

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] The end of net-zope
  2012-02-29  8:51 [gentoo-dev] The end of net-zope Dirkjan Ochtman
  2012-02-29 19:42 ` Pacho Ramos
@ 2012-03-01 18:50 ` Mike Gilbert
  2012-03-01 21:48   ` Dirkjan Ochtman
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gilbert @ 2012-03-01 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Tomorrow, March 1, is the deadline for removing almost all of the
> Zope/Plone packages from the portage tree (those who still want them
> can get them from Arfrever's Progress overlay).
>
> Since only one or two packages would remain in the category, do we
> want the category to stay around, or should it be removed from the
> tree? We could move the remaining packages to dev-python.
>
> Similarly, there is an empty herd. Do we have a procedure for
> end-of-lifeing herds?
>

Arfrever pinged me to add him to the net-zope herd as a proxy
maintainer for the remaining zope packages. Are there any objections
to this?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] The end of net-zope
  2012-03-01 18:50 ` Mike Gilbert
@ 2012-03-01 21:48   ` Dirkjan Ochtman
  2012-03-01 22:22     ` Mike Gilbert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2012-03-01 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 19:50, Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Arfrever pinged me to add him to the net-zope herd as a proxy
> maintainer for the remaining zope packages. Are there any objections
> to this?

What remaining packages? Just zope-fixers, zope-interface and zc-buildout?

I don't think that would be helpful.

Cheers,

Dirkjan



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] The end of net-zope
  2012-03-01 21:48   ` Dirkjan Ochtman
@ 2012-03-01 22:22     ` Mike Gilbert
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gilbert @ 2012-03-01 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 19:50, Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Arfrever pinged me to add him to the net-zope herd as a proxy
>> maintainer for the remaining zope packages. Are there any objections
>> to this?
>
> What remaining packages? Just zope-fixers, zope-interface and zc-buildout?
>
> I don't think that would be helpful.
>

Yeah, never mind.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-01 22:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-29  8:51 [gentoo-dev] The end of net-zope Dirkjan Ochtman
2012-02-29 19:42 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-03-01 18:50 ` Mike Gilbert
2012-03-01 21:48   ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2012-03-01 22:22     ` Mike Gilbert

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox