From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-71277-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF5B1386F1
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  9 Aug 2015 14:45:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10ADC14225;
	Sun,  9 Aug 2015 14:44:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F46D14212
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  9 Aug 2015 14:44:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: djc)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4801F340A59
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  9 Aug 2015 14:43:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wibhh20 with SMTP id hh20so119777682wib.0
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 07:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.87.168 with SMTP id az8mr16696276wib.53.1439131436183;
 Sun, 09 Aug 2015 07:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.14.66 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 07:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55C76603.7020109@gentoo.org>
References: <1439128706.40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1.xmw@gentoo>
 <55C75F19.90201@gentoo.org> <CAKmKYaCvBt=+PPjdWSU_nyTJspoD=67phtHCQhDhHA0wMOdnTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55C76603.7020109@gentoo.org>
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 16:43:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKmKYaDLp3KUG4iGZXysRYhRKPHE8why07FJ6mykE7uEhR6asQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re:
 [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: e9a655ec-41c9-4713-835e-03006f6562f8
X-Archives-Hash: 6fd045ea2b442d79b55c1e61a732e5ca

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it
>> "bug 557022", or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if
>> you have a single-line commit message only.
>
> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that
> parse commit messages.

I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all
purposes, even for tools.

Also, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648.