From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59027-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45445198005
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06C81E0639;
Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2878AE0605
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:34:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com (mail-oa0-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: djc)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16F92335E33
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:34:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k14so12062503oag.39
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:34:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.60.13.65 with SMTP id f1mr21716077oec.87.1362562491372; Wed,
06 Mar 2013 01:34:51 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.8.2 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 01:34:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAB_KkxwxL913ztkU+v8RW0fRsQfvVbihB+g3BJys-sq0gYb0cA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB_Kkxx4OfRcJe82ji-FWLm1nH_FJfF9CAekyQxp6XZFP+K_5Q@mail.gmail.com>
<513707E6.40708@flameeyes.eu> <CAB_KkxwxL913ztkU+v8RW0fRsQfvVbihB+g3BJys-sq0gYb0cA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:34:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKmKYaDAfe0MXVfbpmhrMiSoyPCrCk-Ah2Zoj7LfPLtPCF_b+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 0326e929-7c24-436d-add2-20fcf3f83089
X-Archives-Hash: ce1c4433ba6640848bab2fee711d55e2
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Not really... are you going to add any more packages?
>
> It's very probable, yes. Also I think 60 packages is quite big number,
> as we have many categories with 20 or even less packages.
It's not *just* the number of packages. I, for one, had never even
heard of it except via your email to this list. And having looked at
the site, I don't really see why people would want to use it, anyway.
Not that you have to explain it, but that leads me to wonder if (a)
there are other Gentoo devs who would maintain this stuff if you
become disinterested, and (b) how many users there even are for
LeechCraft-related packages.
FWIW, in Debian's popcon, there seems to be about 6 users who have
LeechCraft installed (which ranks it slightly south of 70,000th).
Cheers,
Dirkjan