From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29AB138CE3 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C16CCE0818; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFEAFE07D2 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE58433F81E for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kx10so6139373pab.21 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:04:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=e8BlBrDA6WKdyhEUDRlMEMbh9YjsKYoFVFkWOtYlyOY=; b=AzBIEKfM4yI9a+utuQ1I4s6KS5JFOpmIAald4vDTGHVKBuTDAq/QeCj89pSOJPPUU8 lTdbsIFXu9he/rn87MVnBzhLrJqRvZyleZkn2y9adSQxlzgvcWl8qAyZAUB2UQpdJ8eN uNEnzjjTMzn1uYkQz1S0MXli+kWjWA5K7vujxE6TIz5jj6WTsHyS3T1OWGgjdUosaxwj zKhoqv7/HfbXDJ0xFgeQJ08Lb2oHr/EV9rGo3DTCIcgt2fE02IqDpRarTHeo7xiA3qw0 yZsajjgEpZM2rKUyBGFFKmBqsNoWe2Aq0sLmi7y3Ff+LEroLkqPuuJ/SkM5yIE3WPZFx de2A== X-Received: by 10.68.93.161 with SMTP id cv1mr38001955pbb.122.1392037449809; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:04:09 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.70.140.134 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52F8C97D.4030403@gentoo.org> References: <52F8C97D.4030403@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:03:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules To: Gentoo Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 9fa422ca-a2c5-4968-bd20-a0ecb92e4e15 X-Archives-Hash: 18c1e270669b31313999cd8a15f5fb64 On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > The daily updated stats [2] show a slow general trend down. > There's historical data (well, just a few days right now at [3] What are you looking at here? .ebuild files in the tree? Or latest version per-package? Old EAPI versions are obviously only a burden for developers if there are actually developers looking at those packages/versions/ebuilds... Cheers, Dirkjan