From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD831386F1 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C54A2141DF; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB59914179 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9D88340656 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so119449148wib.1 for ; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 07:26:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.203.138 with SMTP id kq10mr37270651wjc.124.1439130402854; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 07:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.14.66 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 07:26:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55C75F19.90201@gentoo.org> References: <1439128706.40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1.xmw@gentoo> <55C75F19.90201@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 16:26:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/) To: Gentoo Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: fa3734e5-e7be-43eb-bb8d-90282fbf41c6 X-Archives-Hash: 4f8a6b254d5552c831033e7732e39e52 On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, hasufell wrote: > I was wondering if we should set a standard for referencing bug reports. > The portage team already does something like that: > https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b7149002bf23889f280c502afe6ceda0b1345ca3 > > Following that, the commit could have been: > ===== > sci-libs/opencascade: add USE=vtk > > thanks to Helmut Jarausch > > X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 > X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557022 > ===== I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it "bug 557022", or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if you have a single-line commit message only. Cheers, Dirkjan