[gentoo-dev] m68k status

public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [gentoo-dev] m68k status
@ 2012-06-01 11:37 Dirkjan Ochtman
  2012-06-01 22:43 ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2012-06-01 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo Development

It looks to me (from looking at eshowkw for python packages quite a
bit) that a great many packages aren't being keyworded on m68k. Would
it perhaps make sense to drop it from the set of stable arches (for
example, in the bugzilla selection thing, or in eshowkw)?

Cheers,

Dirkjan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] m68k status
  2012-06-01 11:37 [gentoo-dev] m68k status Dirkjan Ochtman
@ 2012-06-01 22:43 ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2012-06-01 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 400 bytes --]

On Friday 01 June 2012 07:37:52 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> It looks to me (from looking at eshowkw for python packages quite a
> bit) that a great many packages aren't being keyworded on m68k. Would
> it perhaps make sense to drop it from the set of stable arches (for
> example, in the bugzilla selection thing, or in eshowkw)?

moving it to ~arch would probably be a good reflection of reality
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-01 22:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-01 11:37 [gentoo-dev] m68k status Dirkjan Ochtman
2012-06-01 22:43 ` Mike Frysinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox