From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SbcJ6-0000AZ-Di for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:47:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FAF7E07A1; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C60E0687 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8987B1B401D for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3996616wgb.10 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.140.160 with SMTP id e32mr1372649wej.46.1338835564102; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.168.82 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:45:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201206031239.21744.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <201206032135.49757.dilfridge@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 20:45:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 633ee7f0-8ab2-4a48-8ead-dd1958566684 X-Archives-Hash: 48e5a0756bd93a9d9eff2c66a00a21a6 On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > Anything we do has to be automated to be of any real value. =C2=A0Ideally > if something goes wrong it should be as detectable as possible. Yeah, but you'd have to part of that at every developer's box. Can we just agree that having the tip of the main tree always signed will be enough for now, and postpone the rest of the discussion until later? Cheers, Dirkjan