From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-57945-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D73B138682
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:23:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA50021C035;
	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:23:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C3B921C010
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:23:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: djc)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A96F833DC0B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:23:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ef5so417045obb.25
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:23:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.60.172.229 with SMTP id bf5mr4515049oec.81.1359123822870;
 Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:23:42 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.90.73 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:23:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <510293E2.7030406@gentoo.org>
References: <50FFE241.6030107@gentoo.org> <CAKmKYaBo4VhujuRF6Xn56JLKWS3g30mvshrvRddZHm2bJ6csfQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <510293E2.7030406@gentoo.org>
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:23:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKmKYaC=arCWO-dahj8CsNU_vgzB=2QZ-7+W9eh0nGU-eehUgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late)
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 72fec995-d1d0-4369-a0ed-ba21c1ef8099
X-Archives-Hash: 0cbbde70c79817ad1a26443ada5e476d

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Depends on whether or not you rebuilt the rdeps -- udev-197 provides
> libudev.so.1 while udev-171 provides libudev.so.0 , so there's
> breakage on stuffs like lvm2 and other ebuilds that link to libudev

Even so, I could downgrade and revdep-rebuild after that, and it
should Just Work, right?

IIRC, I had nothing rebuilt by revdep-rebuilt after merging udev-197,
so maybe this is not an issue for me.

Maybe you could add a note about this to the news item?

Cheers,

Dirkjan