From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DA19139694 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 07:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74ADD21C075; Thu, 11 May 2017 07:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224C3E0CE3 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 07:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f180.google.com (mail-wr0-f180.google.com [209.85.128.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDCC133E1CB for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 07:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f180.google.com with SMTP id z52so13079039wrc.2 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 00:30:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcD70m2879zsyDqPqPmu5Aa8d40ba/LtVHrRpVMUraoeo1yPCAnf 9zGGD0rjPjSIPaAOQXcVGpg0lBQjiQ== X-Received: by 10.46.75.2 with SMTP id y2mr4365703lja.59.1494487801960; Thu, 11 May 2017 00:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.158.21 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2017 00:29:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1494485436.1333.15.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1494185038.1333.2.camel@gentoo.org> <52ce2db1-6553-c720-8408-27bdc024e432@gentoo.org> <891aaaa8-e75f-9e84-96f2-cb65490a4a3f@gentoo.org> <31716672-f22e-8770-12df-0accfd4d5b62@gentoo.org> <92e119f5-6de3-fe77-e95e-c2d3aa6c521b@gentoo.org> <20170510150808.GA24622@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <56bf6bd4-fddf-b9df-18fb-39ece33e4521@gentoo.org> <1494444251.30729.2.camel@gentoo.org> <1494444548.1333.12.camel@gentoo.org> <60ee90e4-125d-4aff-2356-ac5df6412a45@gentoo.org> <94b95da2-ece8-3ab9-05ab-955aba264ad0@gentoo.org> <1494485436.1333.15.camel@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 09:29:41 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp To: Gentoo Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 8cc55ed6-fd23-4f5e-9063-d384a9b0e26e X-Archives-Hash: c930bc78116ad5b2d5cd2cf498a8d68d On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:50 AM, David Seifert wrote: > 1. ppc(= 32 bit) will be massively dekeyworded, ppc64 will stay > unchanged (also given that it is an active arch in general and gets CPU > upgrades from IBM/OpenPOWER). Sounds good. You started the thread also talking about ia64 and sparc. What about those? Cheers, Dirkjan