From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4581C138679 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7BD721C029; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF6C21C008 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B626F33DA9B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id v19so134714obq.21 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 01:20:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.60.172.229 with SMTP id bf5mr3899698oec.81.1359105618946; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 01:20:18 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.90.73 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 01:19:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50FFE241.6030107@gentoo.org> References: <50FFE241.6030107@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:19:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late) To: Gentoo Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 9b72d5d8-022a-48c2-9c7a-8001aefd1def X-Archives-Hash: 72738320b9198b72a6bc1c255d67ed8a On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > please review this news item, seems we need one after all Here's a crazy idea: can we patch our kernel to let "make oldconfig" default CONFIG_DEVTMPFS to true? Or better yet, request that this is changed upstream? Also, after installing udev-197, are there any negative consequences to just downgrading to -171 again? Cheers, Dirkjan