From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-65004-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5ED138F1A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C8C9E0B37;
	Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:12:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A522E0A99
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:12:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: djc)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 268F433FAAB
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:12:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ld10so4843997pab.38
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:12:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=mtDD3Y+eW/Rq4vfJ6l1VFleCr+qMbZpfzye/ONuq37M=;
        b=Dz+O4brdFzVCM5m7e+bCZsl2gFeOcZj4PdoCPejsZi/1Gu/j4ReMMLCR+RCUwI+R9L
         OwhDXagJKmNc48oDVrpq/QOs+f+Iba4kggspxcliH1cGRsJaGGohyHvJAcz1KL3kXfl9
         WKDjDYGmw+qNvCR27iRH37HUfbbcxPZa/zEIaIegWw//UWxOu6+PSa7XdHOrdKoPRQZ+
         32xTm2arBQYY8knxnp2Iw9F6vJT2qkrEablmCfDBr/Yqq+Dv3uUGJnttjGjbIiPd6j7h
         d6gdkpnznOCTIb2skOZQa/UBmaPOz+DT2fs+q/rcKV/7g/uVhV6HHcKVpCX6mBFKhUui
         A7Kw==
X-Received: by 10.68.170.36 with SMTP id aj4mr16120531pbc.54.1393092758967;
 Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.70.140.134 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:12:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140222190254.6b2876d9@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
References: <20140222000638.775a030d@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <CAKmKYaArk2qWFF+OabvhxQmaLQKh-GuofhX=Ra1m55pdtYHC2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140222180824.4fae7b24@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <pan$a5e28$3ca24901$947b723e$c719911d@cox.net>
 <20140222190254.6b2876d9@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 19:12:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKmKYaBk+PzLoEE1KoJ_t26KYRUKOtbuJgFkCmud80u6yHOg0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New categories: mate-base and mate-extra
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 61878cdd-bc35-4822-83d8-1ce9b8f3f840
X-Archives-Hash: a524a6fd105a31f5f462184fb2628056

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org> wrote:
> While still inconsistent with what already exists, that indeed sounds
> sane towards the user, +1; does someone object 'mate-desktop'?

I was thinking mate-de, but -desktop seems okay, too.

Anyway, you should probably give people some time to voice their
objections before you go into action mode.

Cheers,

Dirkjan