From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Over-reliance of Gentoo projects on overlays
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:51:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKmKYaBW0DF5UPfNZTgcVuo+rNgTWP2Kcc5Hnt+1f9n8jNfSSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO-1Pb6bBjADzwW6q9miUAeXt+CofSsjFx3JP-kaKj_sGAwARw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Alexander V Vershilov
<alexander.vershilov@gmail.com> wrote:
> The main point that haskell ecosystem is very breaky and only latest
> version is supported, so
> the safest path is to be on a bleeding edge and patch inconsistent
> applications. So if one
> package gets updated then commonly we need to fix its reversed deps,
> if it were in tree than
> we would be involved into stabilization process and in the end will
> delay updating deps, and
> the difficulty of tracking all version variant will be much higher
> than no, at the end the quality
> of the packages in tree will fall. Really we can _guarantee_ that
> everything work in overlay
> but there is either no technical or bureaucracy reasons that prevent
> from fixing as soon as
> possible.
Still seems like working in gentoo-x86 without doing stabilization
would cover most of those bases. Working in the unstable main tree is
still a lot better than keeping stuff out there in an overlay, IMO.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-12 16:51 [gentoo-dev] Over-reliance of Gentoo projects on overlays Michał Górny
2013-06-12 16:59 ` hasufell
2013-06-12 17:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2013-06-12 17:05 ` hasufell
2013-06-12 17:13 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2013-06-12 17:19 ` hasufell
2013-06-12 17:23 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-06-13 4:56 ` Alexander V Vershilov
2013-06-13 6:51 ` Dirkjan Ochtman [this message]
2013-06-16 4:08 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-06-16 7:36 ` Alexander V Vershilov
2013-06-17 0:50 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-06-15 3:32 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-06-13 5:44 ` Michał Górny
2013-06-13 8:29 ` René Neumann
2013-06-12 20:10 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-13 3:37 ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-12 20:32 ` gmt
2013-06-29 18:22 ` Thomas Kahle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKmKYaBW0DF5UPfNZTgcVuo+rNgTWP2Kcc5Hnt+1f9n8jNfSSw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=djc@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox