From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569F4138247 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F7C3E0B83; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7090EE09A4 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com (mail-pb0-f41.google.com [209.85.160.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD1E933F974 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id up15so4785861pbc.14 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:33:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=WMz1pQS8lhtDNYlJLPDeJC4RnAmysCqnvG4xBaiKuMA=; b=CRokg3xxik+vIXto+eC/YhLeuwNC7krQuqJhBivil51iAc0vlOi8rTW9sUHrcig9Rf odEQaaZwp6YPdSPBuzNabdGqkRF/FyBmnjx5sCm3rNzQGkPdIKmbpid3W1r6vtvYVc6D e+PImY8OAjEehzmQrfUEEb3PM6eNUjP1Hu7Z27PFuAiCw7WKKolDclFLdJC1Gxq/4lhV G/1vcdROIVJ1BXRD3fzrFJLV+08aE9RcBTD8S4foW5GJF/u7v1ytZ0aS4Zj7AxkIWOrR Fj+Uq/yN1g+/XCLO0kfeOKB1VS+FyRHCydAnoSNAdRmkal6zW52s5CvvCEEQBs/HDTtl N9FA== X-Received: by 10.68.12.138 with SMTP id y10mr8770523pbb.101.1390062836829; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:33:56 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.70.93.39 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:33:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1390062615.24148.87.camel@belkin5> References: <1390059274.24148.80.camel@belkin5> <52DAA58B.7060402@gentoo.org> <1390062615.24148.87.camel@belkin5> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:33:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding long delays on GLSA generation To: Gentoo Development Cc: security@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 097ba279-f3be-493b-b18a-d3575737c5c4 X-Archives-Hash: a059b3525e474a24466cbb4512a935f6 On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > What I want to achieve is to try to get this problem solved, I don't > think has any sense to have pending GLSA bugs waiting for ages (yes, > ages), I see this for really a lot of packages, the pointed one was only > one example, but there are many more (like glib, dotnet stuff...) >From my perception, the security team in recent months has gone through great lengths to improve the process and to work on the backlog of old security bugs. AIUI, this *is* getting fixed, it just takes some time to fix it properly. Cheers, Dirkjan