From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-63278-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890B41381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39C93E0C07;
	Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:59:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1CDE0BFF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:59:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com (mail-pd0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: djc)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7815733F1E2
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:59:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z10so10552038pdj.3
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=EtPTN42VYrAHXo3AEJDoAfDfduIeb5rxN+M+sDjkotU=;
        b=iumMw0K/oG/SLP1IDoa8YIA1VbCfP9Tr08XDKdGqoxbFEHMg0/ZRZHM3kiYetV9h2C
         Rz1OE0Ojc9NF0IrVWw5hv/jiKf0g6lrfqd2UjNR1wwhdohqMikyJSY/0lBOavcWlBZJM
         XUB7lFhy0AK3rGnF58WPEHvBFKHjiy31T7U2YsjAir9JShRtnX9aPCAyHJm6dEu5WZyC
         oCW1kDpmwqry5QLAsbdolxwHhDIUAFvAKlnJs24gzPCaqbAlCVUL1+8J/4JkUU38eHV2
         Zog6i6OBFzgyMS32qdMhFX5Gg6dCok12rPx0fXhvrp5sV/9QdeFDy/yjtEL0tOt4stdv
         7tQA==
X-Received: by 10.66.179.143 with SMTP id dg15mr23963535pac.52.1382453974598;
 Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.70.124.194 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20131022165512.06ccf5bf@gentoo.org>
References: <20131020141538.1cfd7b3d@gentoo.org> <5263C9C6.6010709@gentoo.org>
 <105901382271553@web25h.yandex.ru> <5263CB10.9020908@gentoo.org>
 <113051382272012@web25h.yandex.ru> <5263E4F1.10804@gentoo.org>
 <5263E953.4030400@gentoo.org> <5263EB44.8060301@gentoo.org>
 <20131022015317.426.qmail@stuge.se> <CAGfcS_mYcN8pZWyXuF29HMmmLUnLCZuQt6hvHKm3UvJuvuhjog@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131022031901.7678.qmail@stuge.se> <52663F25.8000804@gentoo.org> <20131022165512.06ccf5bf@gentoo.org>
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:59:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKmKYaAsRsefcGvhQf_6x44GGtGXjKMagJo5-ijKBcjpXsXoow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OT: user-developer/privileges in IRC
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 031dd808-04c9-4258-9de7-dcbdce7b5abc
X-Archives-Hash: ffcacbb8d680bad2d8ff7b1246d433b5

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, yac <yac@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Now I wonder if the +m on IRC was set proactively or reactively. If the
> former it could be worth a try to -m.

Yeah, I kind of feel it should be -m, as well. If need be, we can be
more proactive about kickbanning people (ops enough, after all).

Cheers,

Dirkjan