From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-52251-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SbmIj-0000Wm-MU
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 05:27:29 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAB48E0AB7;
	Tue,  5 Jun 2012 05:27:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60786E0A60
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  5 Jun 2012 05:26:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: djc)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BA461B4016
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  5 Jun 2012 05:26:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so4333876wgb.10
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.138.130 with SMTP id a2mr11213026wej.35.1338873979856;
 Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.168.82 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120604204132.GB3692@localhost>
References: <CAGfcS_mkN9ZSvJcSUaVf7=+hRpgKeQ0k97YXo4eqAGZQ-3LOYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKmKYaA=+-3qe=SRs=u7rY3=08Wjo8H6jStm2bLda2PBNSx7fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGfcS_mHA=pfY4AwS6pwwWQW=K1SotQLiWna1ks0dNvQ4vwe1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKmKYaB7xj4TCZZ1PDLYq1hONzo8rQTNq8mVR2anLiHA8KpHmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGfcS_n7YtDfCC4BqMnac34eN_5E-wigLneWmUivOFjxoNHyOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKmKYaDZPGD1TEfjPaqTLg_+poE6hQiZU=wEBNPgaGHk+BRL3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGfcS_mSg5nySMoph9MwNAWxtOJJd70PV6EBEC0e4OK9Z=F=-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKmKYaCEjjwu-UnY9guBmKWwK+Wtrz49ie_5z=gdm1AUZhcWDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120604191000.GA3692@localhost> <CAGfcS_mr91F8V8LVqQQ97qAQKH8gr1k5=3QFFrqd-dGkWAjPag@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120604204132.GB3692@localhost>
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 07:25:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKmKYaAi85RugR1od5CiJP=2ViGbRku4GDdU66N9LRVQ6qBjjw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 52452725-5008-4481-beca-6819fa051c6e
X-Archives-Hash: 64dc83afae8d7ad0cad897c99b095590

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> wrote:
> The dev, prior to signing that, should be verifying what they're
> adding (moreso, what exists between last signed rev and theirs), they
> agree to and know of. =C2=A0Specifically, they're asserting their additio=
n.

What Rich is arguing (and which I think makes some sense) is that
people will probably not be inclined to verify the signature of the
tree they just pulled from gentoo-x86. We can't really force them too,
since it happens on their own machine.

Still, I think we should drop this discussion for now.

Cheers,

Dirkjan