From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B17751382C5 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C363E0999; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B97AE095E for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3488D335C53 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j21so13107710wmh.1 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:49:24 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdL9WMVJ0Gz/HNCYYXAVA/M7hbPYgujscMOW2OX6/9t/wzN00Wb Lnzf7cvW3jpSw9mCf1lL8i6ln8QLUAePmpBZPgY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226Suw2NaKuBQaiCHyInqpyV7LClxfJ2ZiqK627YpvwKl9GylhpO7vdhEZTVAVGl0bNgBt7g+lXDqA3479VAuwE= X-Received: by 10.28.202.6 with SMTP id a6mr1734273wmg.95.1516708161450; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:49:21 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.120.7 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:49:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1516708002.23875.1.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1516053701.952.9.camel@gentoo.org> <1516708002.23875.1.camel@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:49:00 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering To: Gentoo Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e083163ec30f8c30563702388" X-Archives-Salt: 9c0d6d3b-ba89-4306-a3fe-caa0a23f8872 X-Archives-Hash: f346be9f1d3232a6ce16b06ccf6b52aa --089e083163ec30f8c30563702388 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm not > sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two lists > in different order so that people could use whichever they prefer. > Not sure having two lists in Bugzilla would be an improvement. It would be nice if more people expressed a preference, though! Regards, Dirkjan --089e083163ec30f8c30563702388 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <= span dir=3D"ltr"><mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm not=
sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two lists
in different order so that people could use whichever they prefer.

Not sure having two lists in Bugzilla would be = an improvement. It would be nice if more people expressed a preference, tho= ugh!

Regards,

Dirkjan
=
--089e083163ec30f8c30563702388--