From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60072138206 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9889E090A; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59307E0900 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF545335C0B for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id x4so16103193wmc.0 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 01:15:37 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfzFy1sd8mDRn2FT2QLRTaTMwTL6GEsXc23lMcJbLXVi8a/wR+s pGmin64jDeEAQj5pERw9cr5xzEHT+hNTi1fnaSs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotFikZ6sDsmS2Juj7htZ4TF4BP2TQ3vvT9/mtA9XI7VhFc8KrapeGvMclKazn655yzWzLENWcK9JeR6aDfjC1U= X-Received: by 10.28.215.146 with SMTP id o140mr13544681wmg.95.1516094134996; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 01:15:34 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.58.10 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 01:15:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1516053701.952.9.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1516053701.952.9.camel@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:15:14 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering To: Gentoo Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11468aac5cdb6b0562e12ceb" X-Archives-Salt: 60ae457a-70f6-4b07-bdf1-83f9c0fb5aa2 X-Archives-Hash: 41d98ff21be155a45cdb4aa555e19936 --001a11468aac5cdb6b0562e12ceb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Besides regrouping, I've also reordered the keywords to use the same > sorting order as eshowkw (i.e. ppc before ppc64), moved 'BSD' into teams (in contrast to 'AMD64 FBSD' and 'X86 FBSD'), and added 'Prefix' team. > I think these are all good improvements. In terms of having the best user experience, I would actually advocate changing the order to sort by frequency/use. So the list would just start with amd64, then x86, arm64, ppc, or something like that? Probably we should still match order with eshowkw, maybe there should be a file somewhere that keeps the current order and we can regenerate it from time to time based on the latest use counts. Regards, Dirkjan --001a11468aac5cdb6b0562e12ceb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <= mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
Besides regrouping, I= 've also reordered the keywords to use the same
sorting order as eshowkw (i.e. ppc before ppc64), moved 'BSD' into = teams=C2=A0
(in contrast to '= ;AMD64 FBSD' and 'X86 FBSD'), and added 'Prefix' team. =

I think these are all good improvement= s. In terms of having the best user experience, I would actually advocate c= hanging the order to sort by frequency/use. So the list would just start wi= th amd64, then x86, arm64, ppc, or something like that? Probably we should = still match order with eshowkw, maybe there should be a file somewhere that= keeps the current order and we can regenerate it from time to time based o= n the latest use counts.

Regards,

Dirkjan
--001a11468aac5cdb6b0562e12ceb--