From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SbWgU-0005vt-7k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:46:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F55DE0771; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D46E06FC for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53ED01B4078 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3694854wgb.10 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 05:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.211.131 with SMTP id w3mr10470410weo.163.1338813952899; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 05:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.168.82 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 05:45:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201206031239.21744.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <201206032135.49757.dilfridge@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:45:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: ec2f4dc2-972f-41f3-864d-dc18d3374d16 X-Archives-Hash: 55f7d8fe0dd9e35ec04bf61317773bed On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > Well, only Robin can explain exactly what he meant, but it sounds like > we don't want the committer field to ever have a non-gentoo email in > it, and signatures should be gentoo as well. =C2=A0So, if a dev just > applies a patch to their tree/etc then there is no issue (just set > author). =C2=A0If a dev wants to actually pull in a commit they'd need to > edit the fields accordingly and re-sign it. =C2=A0Not sure offhand how to > best do that (I assume it is possible - probably with some variation > on rebase or something rebase calls). Well, it doesn't seem like a big deal IF there's an explicit merge commit that's signed by a dev. Cheers, Dirkjan