Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

[landis blackwell <blackwelllandis@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1401 bytes --]

No fun allowed
On May 14, 2016 12:06 PM, "Rich Freeman" <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:59 PM, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@iee.org>
> wrote:
> > On 14/05/16 17:53, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> >> Gordon Pettey schrieb:
> >>
> >>> So, it's perfectly okay to make direct commits of obviously broken
> >>> code that
> >>> has no chance of working, because community something mumble...
> >>
> >> You may have missed some sarcasm in the post which you replied to.
> >> Plus, I don't think anybody said or implied that committing broken
> >> things is ok.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> >>
> > I think the time is coming, given the diversity of members of this list,
> > to add <sarcasm></sarcasm> tags when we are not describing something
> > literally. It becomes very difficult to follow the thread of
> > conversation when people are (not) communicating their true thoughts!!
> >
>
> While this is certainly sensible, the irony here is that this whole
> discussion was started by somebody making a sarcastic remark when
> simply pointing out a mistake would have been just as functional.
>
> Nobody thinks it is ok to commit broken code.  What it seems like
> we'll be debating until there is only one of us left is how
> unprofessional we should be when pointing that out.
>
> --
> Rich
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1886 bytes --]