From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDCB139737 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:13:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E37261425C; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com (mail-io0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 005ED14250 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iodt126 with SMTP id t126so21442105iod.2 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:13:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6y7uMwy7/rJCBeb1wj09rxLh/PXUMbXnPCXYhK0aN4Y=; b=o/nsvpDUIqBN5PmZkveXC8n8TJ/vAmIoiHez8bscLsmvd4edCIqF4EuFnjy2fcNJzF 8JfqDxXiKidqJdmCVUKht7i9bwrJFlpYyqSVbvGJcqE9PIsDP9eJP2Bvrvqx6OSatddH BkhlWAmyi9lsqztjMj+Elc3UveOzd8bBIdXkyvL7XcFqHnf8H1E/hxpRbUe+tTavOHEN YpxJx1RjZUV8WfkFvnIU6C1ZqYJKZ4RdCbi4X6EC9DG7F3qFc2ZSJXw0rvLKYWOK18Nn jTREJ3LashQjTvR4oNtduuw6CKklvou4ASe7lFneFiItPAJ0M1d8mbEAV+mbPX9OdeSd lW9w== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.165.142 with SMTP id o136mr29083449ioe.120.1439320423164; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:13:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.225.136 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:13:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55CA4413.5090009@gentoo.org> References: <55C9D15E.6060506@gentoo.org> <55CA4413.5090009@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:13:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: useflag policies From: Gregory Woodbury To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 06cfb07f-9732-4b79-95a6-bdc90f06b641 X-Archives-Hash: 4da2d17d4c51fa2fa282079b5c1c2e5c Is a possible solution something like an eselect module to indicate the preferred interface kit? It could default to any package that is available with a sequential set of preferred order. Then ebuild would consult the eselect module, and users who care can select the kit they want, and users who don't care/know get the default. Just a nickel's worth opinion. Due to inflation it isn't 2 cents any more. -- G.Wolfe Woodbury redwolfe@gmail.com