From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DE71393F1 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2B2221C0B8; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36F321C0A3 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so125357445wic.1 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:09:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TFgCNETLrLQCuKPoDSGoCCgVzMwkUNtvQm9Nsz+ti6U=; b=TwGjQWWZsA4CFpoGX/8jtNjtcuXwHLgYlgn4kZND3m2MxYw04T+vPJ8YObbWKBDpP2 dQABmLwIWv7jNri4FM/z2Rp2px1umMhuKbh5vHWxa7jwkAYO9vhkfKvfmZyaFp+x6V8p TWCKwgrMABgqT51owH9bKC1rfF01ak0RldSTSpMENBNCpExD8i97WGRQbxE5QbTKqgdW jUQ7xNjc8F1ozbuoZcJcqSDNwQX+o5el8WNq8ryylRN6L93qEdOoa2tWCBbIG+a+vbLf JoEpt179q5yeZV9qCr0Mtbhl5Gl5gjLVNOeyNglslD7glvD6p7SWkn1srWjmynO6yuqO o6bQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.174.201 with SMTP id bu9mr26868946wjc.73.1442210943417; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.212.138 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:09:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <22006.24676.585145.935143@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <22006.24676.585145.935143@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:09:03 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. From: konsolebox To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: fac0249c-b33c-48ad-811c-fc2f9723a4d4 X-Archives-Hash: 61597d45afd7130866c5ab80904f5a46 On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Sorry, but I don't get it. How would these be different from the > existing "=pkg-1.0.2a*" and "=pkg-1.0.2*"? Because they could also match pkg-1.0.2aa (not sure if it's still valid atom) and pkg-1.0.20 respectively.