From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59734-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEF81381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:02:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C23DFE0BDA;
	Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:02:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com (mail-vc0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32273E0BB2;
	Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:02:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id m16so4950653vca.11
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=XsMNP5U00WVtqdP2MSU4yg91Tm07aPslaabPdnBbq8Q=;
        b=j3Qtfw/Ng95rN0b55qSmTyAF7Fue6EmuxIeEi6QcDTogi4Z/8TELDmqQRBKiVnEjcO
         WWGEAntgPwkFrxkrf+N7w96561PPYU2yW08zWbyHoDtiz/zQCkeJ5Iq6c7v4Ip5iWtzb
         rJZ9pWXAy0OteM+C+IN+cF/g/R70bZFnF48hZQa3fTb1+Z0xZ2T/KizeCKxsTV9X7lSA
         0JH28ldPF87jEbZZDFr1VvMmMxTVJEFKfoyf9N/2sqipJ+iIaxYOqFyDlGRQzCuP9eiO
         3dK/9RstUcLAD4yADSNQpKjyVPELIyYDeFg1ufqa7Tblo5QGKI7JDDUFNywyJxD1Efwv
         krOg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.237.137 with SMTP id vc9mr12748706vdc.102.1366480943410;
 Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.131.129 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:02:23 +0400
Message-ID: <CAJai-TJ+OmQ=Ey48f2oScB-ZAkskK=wCXcDui-asaTqrY+eE_g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] About src_test() in perl-modules
From: Mikle Kolyada <zlog.gentoo@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0117675139744304dacea37c
X-Archives-Salt: c22281e3-2118-4255-9e88-6e930b5df6cb
X-Archives-Hash: be4c88a2e1e05fabdcb4b19dc7b77b38

--089e0117675139744304dacea37c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Lately, i saw many bugs like =dev-perl/
${packagename}: fails test. Me just interested proper way to fix those
bugs? Sure, it's good when we have clear version for bump w/o problem. But
this is not always.... What common ways to fix those bugs? (I know that we
can disable bad tests)

--089e0117675139744304dacea37c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<div dir="ltr">Lately, i saw many bugs like =dev-perl/<div class="" id="0.6143622735607_:s1">${packagename}: fails 
test. Me just interested proper way to fix those bugs? Sure, it&#39;s good 
when we have clear version for bump w/o problem. But this is not 
always.... What common ways to fix those bugs? (I know that we can 
disable bad tests)</div></div>

--089e0117675139744304dacea37c--