From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-73559-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3561384B4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Dec 2015 20:37:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAF6021C039;
	Mon,  7 Dec 2015 20:36:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE0DDE088C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Dec 2015 20:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com (mail-io0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: floppym)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 508BF340A5D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Dec 2015 20:36:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ioc74 with SMTP id 74so2701385ioc.2
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:36:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.107.167.18 with SMTP id q18mr282950ioe.141.1449520609501;
 Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:36:49 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.3.27 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:36:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1449428612-20538-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org>
References: <1449428612-20538-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org>
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:36:30 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAJ0EP43vma5nEnc8+jnhb+SXnpBXLqu8JoBp7OksU0BrLhHbFA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP43vma5nEnc8+jnhb+SXnpBXLqu8JoBp7OksU0BrLhHbFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] python-r1 suite clean up & impl reorder
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 6ef16d8f-3f10-425f-8874-7f9e00af30d6
X-Archives-Hash: c14cbef98dd63a8ade9f3dfa7a021b43

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org> =
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's another patchset. Mostly fixups inspired by multilib-build.eclass
> changes with a few little additions.
>
> Changes:
>
> 1. eclass-set variables are now read-only,

Sounds ok, but might break some ebuilds.

> 2. 'unset -f' is used to unset temporary & local functions,
> 3. implementations are reordered for sane order.
>
> I've tested this with a few dozen random distutils-r1, python-r1,
> python-any-r1 and python-single-r1 packages. However, for
> the implementation reorder a larger tinderbox run would be appreciated.
>
> As explained in the commit, the reorder may influence files installed by
> a package, and implementation selected by python_setup(). This should
> not cause issues for correctly written ebuilds, and should help us find
> those that are not correctly written ;-).
>
> In other words, we're finally considering Python 3.x preferred over
> Python 2.x.

That could be a significant change, and I do expect that this will
break some ebuilds.

Any easy way to test this first? Or should we just be ready for the bug rep=
orts?