From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SrzK0-0002d5-GQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:35:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FEB8E075F; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134D5E0747 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7B2E1B40C7 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyt57 with SMTP id t57so2330363wey.40 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.4.147 with SMTP id 19mr2065486wej.109.1342737281174; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.3.142 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:34:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50087884.90006@gentoo.org> References: <20120719151422.1fb9883b@sera-17.lan> <50087884.90006@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:34:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: l10n.eclass From: Mike Gilbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 2eec1452-7d6a-4068-8a66-91be15f8f740 X-Archives-Hash: 9f23698204a3c11446cd954153afa68e On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/19/2012 06:14 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: >> Could be that Portage re-exports a sanitized >> LINGUAS tough, but I doubt it. > > Portage does sanitize it if there are any linguas_* flags in IUSE, > otherwise it lets the variable pass through without sanitizing it. That's good; we definitely don't want to "sanitize" it if there are no linuguas_* flags in IUSE. This would break LINUGUAS support for many autotools/gettext based packages, where the autotools code parses LINGUAS directly and the ebuild does nothing with it.