From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A6B1382C5 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 19:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33F61E0A6B; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 19:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAA76E0A5C for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 19:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id n4so2984580iow.12 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:05:01 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532eHOZSoRXgfQXVd9WdsOPxV0YFv9RPSetqZjgLHPb4ZxoXERg0 6b07gFuOpeVV8bltvTPjtbI3jh7KTUXPPctwn2o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJye78gTTFaPN3WYPv6IZ/FSmIJkMuJ6E7STnp1B1UlMCznU0NxNoN9BWiLeFpZPxdvL0bnlWN6e95aS1Efhj4M= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6810:: with SMTP id d16mr5142363ioc.100.1608318299660; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:04:59 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201217174909.1711154-1-floppym@gentoo.org> <20201217181216.1825482-1-floppym@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: From: Mike Gilbert Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:04:48 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] glep-0063: Add section about the Gentoo keyserver To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: a517575f-5a06-4680-8553-0ba3d4b036c4 X-Archives-Hash: b08a1739c110c6c1756e1d536034b432 On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 2:45 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > Doesn't the same restriction apply to relicensing it? > > No, because the CC licenses have an explicit provision that allows it > when distributing a modified work (which they call an "Adaptation", > defined in section 1a). > > For example, CC-BY-SA-3.0 says in section 4b: > > You may Distribute or Publicly Perform an Adaptation only under the > terms of: (i) this License; (ii) a later version of this License with > the same License Elements as this License; (iii) a Creative Commons > jurisdiction license (either this or a later license version) that > contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g., > Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 US)); (iv) a Creative Commons Compatible > License. [...] > > Item (ii) is what gives us the right to distribute under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Thank you for taking the time to explain this.