From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-80007-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17026139694
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF74821C14A;
	Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:03:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 625A921C08B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:03:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qt0-f180.google.com (mail-qt0-f180.google.com [209.85.216.180])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: floppym)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F225340BEA
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:03:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n21so113517374qta.1
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1kHwRSVPG6juFBb1BUuu7Jr3umPOjxVsIuoEe/maSDAHal/XrmeSx3fkM1lDaiw7vOMY+uFt9xd/KBAw==
X-Received: by 10.200.35.184 with SMTP id q53mr17559996qtq.235.1490033007088;
 Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.45.11 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170320142718.GA13580@linux1>
References: <1489958564.1346.2.camel@gentoo.org> <20170320142718.GA13580@linux1>
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:03:06 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAJ0EP43H6MiNW3aBnzrfccQEZuPHM=9qRcBtxuRX05ZZfAx-qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP43H6MiNW3aBnzrfccQEZuPHM=9qRcBtxuRX05ZZfAx-qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: aspell-dict-r1.eclass
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: b4a665e4-cd8f-40a3-8243-db63a99d6c0c
X-Archives-Hash: db9f5fc9fdcbecf801b618aa6d95fe6e

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:27 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I'm curious, why the revbump?
>
> If all other eapis are staying in the eclass and the support is
> identical, you don't need to create a new eclass, and there is a lot
> less work involved in updating the ebuilds that inherit it. :-)

He's making the eclass die for any EAPI other than 6. This breaks
backward compatibility.