Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

[Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>]

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>>>> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that
>>>>> parse commit messages.
>>>>
>>>> I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all
>>>> purposes, even for tools.
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure the majority of developers don't care that one developer
>>> uses "X-Gentoo-Bug" and another just adds it to the commit title.
>>>
>>> I like /guidelines/ in the sense that, if I don't know something, I can look
>>> it up. But don't make it mandatory until we start depending on it (for
>>> instance, when we would automate stuff based on the content of the commit
>>> message).
>>
>> I'd just go with "Gentoo-Bug". The X- is pointless since it was
>> for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in
>> style.
>>
>
> I'd be fine with that and add a reference to the kernel guideline [0] to
> the wiki as well, so that it is clear that we also allow/use Acked-by,
> Reviewed-by, Suggested-by and whatnot.
>
> I'll wait for more ++ though.

I like Gentoo-Bug. Much nicer without the X-.