From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6BBC15806E for ; Fri, 19 May 2023 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD1D9E08C3; Fri, 19 May 2023 17:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6984DE0898 for ; Fri, 19 May 2023 17:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw1-f178.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-561f10b6139so20275707b3.2 for ; Fri, 19 May 2023 10:51:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyqCKJWd2HyZtD0KUtm+nOe8iVT8bogec5H00DSFImgTrYUl08S VqJvymeOlCkwxSCz23yI7t1bLrx1JLZ48teNO78= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ47WRy9GClwIVyssZmi7MoJF0I4zCDANFGs5As1ndUAmYQ9fDMDzqTaPn1WyNz+UPEDdOlCConshdkGQD2abQ8= X-Received: by 2002:a81:9245:0:b0:561:beec:89d3 with SMTP id j66-20020a819245000000b00561beec89d3mr3487701ywg.6.1684518694693; Fri, 19 May 2023 10:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <874jo9grwf.fsf@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <874jo9grwf.fsf@gentoo.org> From: Mike Gilbert Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 13:51:23 -0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: app-portage/layman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c8f4fadb-2f16-4dc7-b17f-b1235855b4fb X-Archives-Hash: 0e4c3115155f8b2c236237df53a3d721 On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:07=E2=80=AFPM Sam James wrote: > > > Alexe Stefan writes: > > > Layman is still a convenient way of managing overlays. It still works > > as intended. > > Is there any way for it to be kept in the repos? > > Is there an issue for you with using eselect-repository, which is > actively maintained and doesn't depend on unmaintained software > (pyGPG and g-sorcery)? Is anyone aware of an alternative for "layman -i repo_name"? I use that on occasion to find overlay maintainers when assigning bug reports.