From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-49402-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RnMyw-0006VY-Dl
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:18:42 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDA35E086E;
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:18:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26D4E06C5
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:18:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: floppym)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 338101B4005
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:18:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pbdu7 with SMTP id u7so2090400pbd.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.73.106 with SMTP id k10mr40854599pbv.35.1326860280602; Tue,
17 Jan 2012 20:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.153.4 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:18:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F163EB2.8050700@gmail.com>
References: <4F0440B3.4090500@gentoo.org>
<CAGfcS_nuCOpK=yrCN38hZMi7CZqYKZuqfmTdybjiOO51fqZ9cQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20120106160719.GB18959@fury>
<201201080047.27281.polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
<20120108103345.382b8db3@pomiocik.lan>
<20120110181452.GA14155@mailgate.onlinehome-server.info>
<20120110194640.7696d2c7@pomiocik.lan>
<4F163EB2.8050700@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:18:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP42dOMzLQNyPnXDNX9OafgQbiUjH-_CMZava0n2GX9OAWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: cbb4f1a5-26f0-4acc-8079-79b81112aaf5
X-Archives-Hash: 62f0c41c8101ce08cb304a138679b745
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100
>> Enrico Weigelt<weigelt@metux.de> =C2=A0wrote:
>>
>>> * Micha?? G=C3=B3rny<mgorny@gentoo.org> =C2=A0schrieb:
>>>
>>>> Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically?
>>>
>>> I guess, he means keeping udev in / ?
>>
>> Because adding 80 KiB of initramfs hurts so much? We should then put
>> more work just to ensure that admin doesn't have to waste 15 minutes to
>> recompile the kernel (if necessary), create an initramfs and add it to
>> bootloader config?
>>
>
> 80Kbs? =C2=A0You sure about that? =C2=A0I somehow failed to mention this =
before. =C2=A0I
> noticed it when I saw another reply to this post. =C2=A0Reality check:
>
> root@fireball / # ls -al /boot/initramfs-3.*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5444240 Jan =C2=A01 07:24 /boot/initramfs-3.1.5-ge=
ntoo.img
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5515132 Jan =C2=A09 07:57 /boot/initramfs-3.2.0-r1=
.img
> root@fireball / #
>
> That's using the dracut tool. =C2=A0Somehow, over 50Mbs is not anywhere c=
lose to
> 80Kbs, or maybe my calculator is broken.
>
Your calculator is off by a power of 10.