From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RnMyw-0006VY-Dl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:18:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDA35E086E; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26D4E06C5 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 338101B4005 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbdu7 with SMTP id u7so2090400pbd.40 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:18:00 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.73.106 with SMTP id k10mr40854599pbv.35.1326860280602; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:18:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.153.4 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:18:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F163EB2.8050700@gmail.com> References: <4F0440B3.4090500@gentoo.org> <20120106160719.GB18959@fury> <201201080047.27281.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> <20120108103345.382b8db3@pomiocik.lan> <20120110181452.GA14155@mailgate.onlinehome-server.info> <20120110194640.7696d2c7@pomiocik.lan> <4F163EB2.8050700@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:18:00 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr From: Mike Gilbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: cbb4f1a5-26f0-4acc-8079-79b81112aaf5 X-Archives-Hash: 62f0c41c8101ce08cb304a138679b745 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Dale wrote: > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> >> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 >> Enrico Weigelt =C2=A0wrote: >> >>> * Micha?? G=C3=B3rny =C2=A0schrieb: >>> >>>> Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically? >>> >>> I guess, he means keeping udev in / ? >> >> Because adding 80 KiB of initramfs hurts so much? We should then put >> more work just to ensure that admin doesn't have to waste 15 minutes to >> recompile the kernel (if necessary), create an initramfs and add it to >> bootloader config? >> > > 80Kbs? =C2=A0You sure about that? =C2=A0I somehow failed to mention this = before. =C2=A0I > noticed it when I saw another reply to this post. =C2=A0Reality check: > > root@fireball / # ls -al /boot/initramfs-3.* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5444240 Jan =C2=A01 07:24 /boot/initramfs-3.1.5-ge= ntoo.img > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5515132 Jan =C2=A09 07:57 /boot/initramfs-3.2.0-r1= .img > root@fireball / # > > That's using the dracut tool. =C2=A0Somehow, over 50Mbs is not anywhere c= lose to > 80Kbs, or maybe my calculator is broken. > Your calculator is off by a power of 10.