From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317DE13877A for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 15:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6DC2E0A88; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 15:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BD5AE0925 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 15:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F1A733FCB7 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 15:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id at20so5877986iec.25 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 08:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.33.100 with SMTP id q4mr33021952igi.8.1405869137204; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 08:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.142.17 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 08:12:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140720124749.4edaf889@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:12:17 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Need help with sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.42.11 build failure From: Mike Gilbert To: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 4ddf0809-684a-4948-aa33-455b55387623 X-Archives-Hash: cb33bef5ba7fb7a0d809f07886c26841 On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Lars Wendler wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I just add e2fsprogs{,-libs}-1.42.11 > > Is there some reason that we continue to maintain these as two > separate packages? It seems like the e2fsprogs ebuild could > build/install both the binaries and the libraries, and that would > probably prevent weird failures like this one. > > I see this in README.subset: Oops, hit send too quickly. I see this in README.subset: --- This distribution contains a subset of the e2fsprogs package; it contains the base libraries (ss, et, uuid, blkid) which may be used by other non-ext2-related applications. This may be useful for non-Linux operating systems that need these libraries for GNOME, but who do not need the ext2/ext3 filesystem utilities. --- >From what I can tell, e2fsprogs and e2fsprogs-libs have mostly the same KEYWORDS with a couple of exceptions: x86-fbsd x86-freebsd x86-solaris It hardly seems worth the effort to maintain 2 ebuilds for these small platforms.