From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59524-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F1F1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Apr 2013 15:02:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC38BE0DE6;
	Sat,  6 Apr 2013 15:02:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C864BE0C95
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Apr 2013 15:02:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: floppym)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAA4233DD35
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Apr 2013 15:02:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id tp5so5212366ieb.8
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 08:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.100.201 with SMTP id fa9mr2174198igb.28.1365260534150;
 Sat, 06 Apr 2013 08:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.102.66 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 08:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130406163357.53fc91be@portable>
References: <515F37C8.2010307@gentoo.org>
	<CAB9SyzQ6UdbsZjeH5QMOyf154mx_8QyweRUB+2qSd17R90cZBQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<515F85EE.9090407@gentoo.org>
	<20130406163357.53fc91be@portable>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 11:02:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP42QitzvD-HVih+a2DVU93OvXUjbqcvsx3S=W-sY_x_LYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libpng 1.6 upgrade and subslotting (and misuse of
 subslotting when there is also normal slotting)
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 4d6617a1-ccc9-49ef-bdd9-13715c4012d9
X-Archives-Hash: 8475920e4628d46d0ff78d9f248dfda1

On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:18:22 -0400
> Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Revbump -- very important in this case, as the slot-operator dep
>> (iirc) does not take effect to allow sub-slot-triggered until after a
>> version with the slot-operator has been emerged.
>>
>> So we want users to re-emerge packages either at the same time
>> libpng-1.6 hits the tree, or beforehand so that they will be triggered
>> for rebuild when libpng-1.6 hits.
>>
>
>
> so we force two rebuilds instead of one ?
>

Well, ideally you would do it in conjunction with a version bump
rather than a revbump.

But failing that, a revbump for an EAPI + dependency change seems like
the safest option.