From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177E613862E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B37921C096; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FE1A21C00C for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (mail-la0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC8D833D3D7 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fo12so3700564lab.0 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:42:32 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.16.110 with SMTP id f14mr1104970lbd.126.1358966552450; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:42:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.39.1 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:42:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <51002BFF.3070402@desaster-games.com> References: <50FFE241.6030107@gentoo.org> <51002BFF.3070402@desaster-games.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:42:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late) From: Mike Gilbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 2732ad15-2102-4c1e-9b35-262c1842d46d X-Archives-Hash: ddbee911257969a58fbca0654f6c7580 On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Felix Kuperjans wrote: > Samuli Suominen wrote: >> please review this news item, seems we need one after all > > Hello Samuli, > > /dev/root is no longer available in this udev version, so people who put > this in their /etc/fstab might end up with an unbootable system. > > I suggest including in the news item, that /dev/root must be replaced > with the actual root device or LABEL=..., UUID=... and the like in > /etc/fstab. > fstab is not consulted for mounting the root filesystem, so it doesn't really matter what you have in there. Either the kernel mounts it based on the kernel command line, or your initramfs mounts it based on whatever your /init programs does.