From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A911381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FD39E097A; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21398E094C for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33FC033E4A5 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c10so3843798ieb.10 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:02:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=QdAEfVe7W8bxTMinPKBLqNNFAmNTpZuUfNrkgG+aoyw=; b=Qwldw6qoVQco/TlyqJ+t8YWk7hItLAziRtM6vBFcP8fpFPk8Bx59w9H54rh4csWHH6 QwXPruOhGNbZulxRdJs9o+TwfmFQvRRg7EC3sipnpM8Ckhxp3jF4M5F2rt6ASkk8hZq0 S/D1F0J+cGFPTArIo6SPqyNX/JsscmgaSAT/U87Ptp9CaAwQyfasjvEwJCsX4G4y71K7 GO8lpxgavzlRl3VrbnOa4ljmvGRJUd2zaJaqq0d0kOugyOMS675xvi5vO0puwSG2HbLd oubPBQvdkpH03xggXLVnIaXO+Hq9TjGoeVo4fp8Lww692YDx+Fzl7Sr7xj4x8u5qY6r0 51kw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.1.37 with SMTP id 5mr1460132igj.29.1371315761486; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.18.227 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:02:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130615180129.72c2ca8b@googlemail.com> References: <51BC9105.5070604@gentoo.org> <20924.37728.751450.362549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130615182413.2e1b2f8a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130615174230.33a7592c@googlemail.com> <20130615180129.72c2ca8b@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:02:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell From: Mike Gilbert To: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 2eb27cd3-dac7-4879-8c3b-512e208857d8 X-Archives-Hash: e7713c4c6c7706ce3b5381d9622eb47e On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: >> If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have >> implemented a certain behavior, making a change to that version of PMS >> to properly document the behavior seems reasonable. > > Part of the point of EAPI stability is that it doesn't just apply to > current versions of package manglers. > So look back at the first versions which implemented EAPI 4 support, and see what the behavior was implemented at the point in time.