From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-101151-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7853B15815E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Feb 2024 15:44:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B326E2A41;
	Fri,  9 Feb 2024 15:44:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F08E2A3B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Feb 2024 15:44:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dc6e4a55a71so990916276.3
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 07:44:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyy2zn7ab94dAUWuMm15rxHMJPls3H++olxU2kr1VEEr12fUPcA
	+rtsieh8SV2RnePgI5DzZy2+CYX2piHQLnV0N1bIsIPwaIYxTTGStI/m02QrVgqw97w6hhcrYg5
	oROEaWMYAeHA3HdN8X4ZSPOX/Rdc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFAZVXE2GYgoUfk0W9yKoNx2uhs01YEIZHN57qre6pKkPao+5CMA5zzWvWPPhMygsST9B/RcrZYaX3X0jSG6Kk=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b18c:0:b0:dc2:1dd0:1d1b with SMTP id
 h12-20020a25b18c000000b00dc21dd01d1bmr1630227ybj.19.1707493445239; Fri, 09
 Feb 2024 07:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <bb44addf-fc52-3d49-edbd-d7a629e72aa@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <bb44addf-fc52-3d49-edbd-d7a629e72aa@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:43:53 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41vaj-RgYhHRWcFhPqJis0+Tcgv8gWR4ph+bGapDACMsw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41vaj-RgYhHRWcFhPqJis0+Tcgv8gWR4ph+bGapDACMsw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] special small-files USE flag without effect on
 dependencies: [ unicode ]
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: c7320daf-602a-4747-9256-f639000f22b9
X-Archives-Hash: 5a97e0489a1a64dcbdce9c47f979a88f

On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 10:23=E2=80=AFAM Andrey Grozin
<grozin@woodpecker.gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Hello *,
>
> pkgcheck complains about each new version of dev-lisp/sbcl:
>
> UseFlagWithoutDeps: version 2.4.1: special small-files USE flag without
> effect on dependencies: [ unicode ]
>
> The USE flag "unicode" in the sbcl ebuild has nothing to do with
> installing / not installing any files, small or otherwise. It determins
> whether the produced lisp will support unicode internally:
>
> sbcl_feature "$(usep unicode)" ":sb-unicode"
>
> Usually this is desirable, so, in USE we have +unicode. Is there a way to
> silence these warnings?

Is there some reason not to enable this unconditionally?