From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9B21381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBC71E09B1; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D58E097A for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4B6C33DF3D for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f4so3573211iea.25 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:22:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uoybbgOzitIDZWSIedg6O1FsBmRLrEGJoVUIn0fkzPM=; b=CvlnJyt+zHJEXIMmSlpLnpJFB+hNyIGZPVjM2OHrXfgRxjpwS28qFispJuyC57U93p TuEVcFecCoXCDYR/3IyZXkpDK4KdtoQrM+PAKIev4eZ1qv8deim/+1BV1Rv/KuUf+hEL 0vblKX5W9FZazpXGzBHUxG8q8ZvqD/MwAtUz6HNKbj4m6hI8WRQegS247Txijd/QnRE1 wpY5Zns23v/2kpZFAb/IfG4s1JO6m6kSRoNBj1FjBDuA62DnRsVmjl//aiykEH5wSjLp GyfnqRRRVa2sWlPZh4d4bGs3Mwekcp6JxZWxYjsmTHi0WnMhd5u2xql9Uf2pk0dFTAIX 9Zbw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.87.71 with SMTP id v7mr1404021igz.29.1371313371330; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.18.227 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:22:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20924.37728.751450.362549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <51BC9105.5070604@gentoo.org> <20924.37728.751450.362549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:22:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell From: Mike Gilbert To: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 770b27b4-bdb9-4cd7-b2b1-b88a33fc9827 X-Archives-Hash: dd94e2f54750fd8d4834484b7d33235d On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> Are there any objections to removing this warning from the >> devmanual? > > PMS doesn't guarantee that die works correctly in a subshell: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12800011.3.3 > > So the devmanual agrees with the spec, and the eclasses need to be > fixed. > > Ulrich > I see mgorny has already filed a bug. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465008 So, I guess I will just patiently wait for EAPI 6.